ACS Responds to Dialog Suit; Files Countersuit Alleging Breach of Contract and Fraud

By Hogan, Tom | Information Today, October 1990 | Go to article overview

ACS Responds to Dialog Suit; Files Countersuit Alleging Breach of Contract and Fraud


Hogan, Tom, Information Today


ACS Responds to Dialog Suit

Files Countersuit Alleging Breach of Contract and Fraud

The gloves have come off and the Marquess of Queensberry rules are in jeopardy in what promises to be a protracted bout of legal fisticuffs between two of the top heavyweights in the information industry--the American Chemical Society (ACS) and Dialog Information Services. On August 31st, the ACS filed its response to Dialog's suit (filed on June 7th) which alleges that ACS has violated anti-trust laws by withholding from Dialog certain portions of the chemical information it collects and creates (see Information Today, July/August 1990). At the same time, the ACS filed a counterclaim which alleges that Dialog has, on many occasions, breached its contracts with ACS' Chemical Abstracts Service division (CAS) and engaged in fraudulent accounting practices in order to avoid paying royalties due CAS.

While the original Dialog suit seeks $150 million in actual and punitive damages, the ACS suit seeks a meager $30 million--$10 million in estimated lost royalties and $20 million in punitive damages. [Should we just subtract the one from the other, have ACS pay Dialog the $120 million difference and forget the whole thing ever happened? Not likely.]

Definitions Are Important

One of the first things that the ACS response attempts to do is to redefine some of the terms used in the Dialog suit. In particular, ACS takes issue with the use of the name "Chemical Registry System Database" or "CRSD." The "definition applied by Dialog to the acronym CRSD is an artificial construct created by Dialog to serve its own purposes in the lawsuit," the ACS response reads.

Why is this important? The assumption is that ACS would like the court to view the services that CAS offers as a "collection" of many independent databases rather than as one single comprehensive database. If this view is accepted, then the act of witholding just five or six of these databases (in particular, the full abstracts and the connection table data) from Dialog, while granting use of all the others, will seem less like an attempt at creating a monopoly and more like plain-old fair (albeit hardball) competition.

Dialog, on the other hand, would like the court to view the information CAS creates as one integrated database. Take away any significant part of the database, the reasoning goes, and you take away the online service's ability to effectively compete in that arena.

The ACS also takes issue with the way Dialog, in its suit, describes the "market" for CAS information. Where Dialog seeks to limit the debate to the market for CAS information only (or failing that, at least just chemical information), CAS believes the definition should be broadened. "Dialog and ACS compete for the distribution of information within a broader scientific and technical information market that includes not only distribution via online computer searches, but also hard copy and other alternative forms...," the suit claims.

If ACS is successful in getting the court to view the market for CAS' services as the much broader market for scientific and technical information, a market filled with overlapping and competing online databases and many other sorts of information services, then Dialog's cries of monopoly will likely fall on deaf ears, especially in light of the fact that, as the suit points out, Dialog is itself the exclusive distributor of 60-some scientific and technical databases.

If Dialog, on the other hand, can keep the focus on CAS' own databases and on CAS' predominant position in the field of chemical information, then quite another outcome might be expected.

As many Information Today readers would surely testify, the natural tendency of professional online searchers is to go to the service with the most complete information available. In the case of the CAS database this means CAS Online (or STN International), and this obviously accounts, in large degree, for the gradual but significant migration from Dialog to CAS online.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

ACS Responds to Dialog Suit; Files Countersuit Alleging Breach of Contract and Fraud
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.