The Reason for War Is Already Established

Sunday Business (London, England), January 12, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Reason for War Is Already Established

HE Bush administration has made a major mistake in allowing the United Nations inspectors to be depicted as detectives in Iraq. It was never their purpose to hunt down Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) as last month's UN resolution makes clear. The UN called on Saddam to come clean about his WMD by making a full and complete declaration of his arsenal so that the inspectors could then locate its constituent parts and destroy them one by one.

They are not meant to be on a wild goose chase, hoping to stumble across a vial of anthrax. But that is what the world thinks they are doing, and because they have yet to discover what is euphemistically called a "smoking gun", it is almost universally believed that America and its allies do not have the casus belli for going to war - and are unlikely to get one before the early spring heat of the Iraqi desert makes military intervention more difficult.

The prospect of invading without the weapons inspectors discovering even vestigial WDM capabilities has already caused Tony Blair, President Bush's most reliable ally, to come out in a cold sweat. The London air was thick with the sound of gears going into reverse last week as stories appeared suggesting that Britain wanted America to postpone action until the autumn and spin-doctors briefed feverishly that 27 January - when the inspectors will present their first report on Iraq's weapons capability - was not a deadline. If they report that the cupboard is bare, then Mr Blair knows he will split his party - even his government - asunder if America nevertheless goes to war and Britain joins it.

Hence the British prime minister's emphasis on the need to find evidence to justify action, the assurances he gave his cabinet on Thursday that there were "no deadlines" that would trigger war and declarations from 10 Downing Street spinners that the inspectors "must be given the time and space they need to do their job".

These are the words of a government going wobbly: even with the discovery of a so-called "smoking gun" it would have been hard enough for Mr Blair to carry his party in the cause of war (even a gun glowing bright green with nuclear radiation would not convince many on the Labour left); without one he has no chance.

The Bush administration must take the blame for finding its most loyal ally now at odds with it. Perhaps because President Bush never really intended to work through the UN in the first place, he and his advisers never paid enough attention to the game plan and tactics that would follow. The Bush administration is in no doubt that Saddam is already in "material breach" of the 8 November UN resolution by refusing to reveal its WMD capabilities in the copious paperwork it has handed over, which is bereft of any revelation. The Bush administration is right. But it has allowed the world to think that Saddam does not need to volunteer the information and that the inspectors must root out his WDM arsenal themselves before military action can be justified.

The United States needs to state plainly the reality of Iraq's existing breach of the November resolution and to make it clear that military action does not depend on the inspectors' detective work proving successful. Washington (and London) will have to realise that the UN inspectors will likely have discovered nothing by the time they make their 27 January report in New York. They have been sent on a mission impossible (Saddam has long ago spirited away any evidence of WMD), but the growing peace party will seize on the inspectors' lack of progress to argue that any Anglo-American intervention would be beyond the pale.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Reason for War Is Already Established


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?