Antony and Cleopatra

By Parker, R. B. | Yearbook of English Studies, Annual 2002 | Go to article overview

Antony and Cleopatra


Parker, R. B., Yearbook of English Studies


Antony and Cleopatra. Ed. by Richard Madelaine. (Shakespeare in Production) Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. 1998. xvi +358 pp. 45 [pounds sterling]; $59.95 (paperbound 15.95 [pounds sterling]; $22.95).

After a generation of hard work the performance dimension of Shakespeare's plays is now recognized as of equal importance to the more conventional traditions of semantic and literary interpretation, but there is still no consensus about the best way to present such material. One of the most thorough formats devised so far is that of Cambridge's `Shakespeare in Production' series, which combines a long introductory overview with commentary notes focusing on staging possibilities in detail.

The latter is keyed to the New Cambridge editions of the text, but this immediately raises two problems. Since the edition has not been influenced by the theatrical commentary and only a relatively small proportion of it needs annotation, the duplication of text is expensive (the books cost $60.00). Moreover, theatrical analysis is now quite separate from literary interpretation, instead of being complementary, so to study the play properly one needs to use both books. And there is also a problem of overlap between notes and introduction. One of the major tensions in all stage history is between a wish to record the whole sequence of performance as it mirrors the cultural preoccupations of different periods--what we may call an `historical' bias--and the desire to focus particularly on those aspects that feed back directly to Shakespeare's text--what we may call a `literary' (or textual) bias. The Cambridge format could manage both these purposes if the `historical' emphasis were restricted to the introduction, with the commentary limited exclusively to the `literary'; but unfortunately no such clear distinction is maintained, so not only are there many duplications of material but, more seriously, there is a blurring of focus that makes the overwhelming mass of detail difficult to absorb.

Despite these problems, Richard Madelaine's study of Antony and Cleopatra is admirably thorough and informative, covering some seventy-three productions in English from Britain, America, Canada, and Australia, plus key non-English-speaking productions by Simonov (Moscow), Sjoberg (Stockholm), Stein (Salzburg), Senda Koreya (Tokyo), and Zadek (Vienna and Berlin). After discussing the play's Jacobean production (rather too speculatively for my taste), the introduction suggests reasons why Shakespeare's play was supplanted in the Restoration, eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries by Dryden's All For Love, either wholesale or amalgamated with sections of the original in what Byron dismissed wittily as a `salad'. The loose narrative of Shakespeare's play fell short of neoclassical principles of unity and created difficulties for stagings which dropped a curtain between scenes; its exotic locations were costly to present in the elaborately `pictorial' style then favoured; and the protagonists offended current ideals of male heroism and (particularly) female propriety. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Antony and Cleopatra
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.