Hearsay Can't Be the Basis for War

By Alexander, Andrew | Daily Mail (London), February 7, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Hearsay Can't Be the Basis for War

Alexander, Andrew, Daily Mail (London)


THE evidence flourished at the United Nations about Saddam Hussein's weapons programme has left the issue in much confusion. But one thing remains all too clear. We are apparently ready to attack Iraq in defiance of the wishes of the UN - on the grounds that Iraq has been defying the UN!

Whether undermining the authority of that organisation, perhaps fatally, would be a total disaster is a matter for argument. But it could well be that this fear will drive some unconvinced and reluctant Security Council members to give the U.S. the authority it seeks, simply to avoid a break-up.

The plethora of detail produced by Secretary of State Colin Powell should not let us fail to see the wood for the trees. If Saddam still has weapons of mass destruction, do we yet have reason to believe that he intends to use them against the U.S. or its European allies? Is there a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda? On that point, we can make a judgment. Powell strongly asserted such a link. Yet our own security services deny it.

Indeed, they say the terrorist organisation and Baghdad have fallen out.

Bin Laden wants a fundamentalist regime in Iraq and Saddam emphatically does not.

We also learn from the police that they have not established a link between DC Stephen Oake's murder in Manchester and Al Qaeda, which Powell also asserted.

This casts doubt on the quality of the American evidence.

Satellite pictures and bugged telephone calls look impressive. And, of course, the Central Intelligence Agency would not doctor such evidence, not for a million dollars. ($2 million?

'Now you're talking . . .'). The evidence Powell produces would not get far in a court of law.

Hearsay and assertions are not enough. Remember, this is the toughest evidence the U.S. has. The right course would surely have been to give it to the weapons inspectors.

There is little point in having them if they are denied information.

Now they know the American evidence, they can look further.

However, the timetable specified by Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, no doubt at Washington's behest, suggests that the Anglo-American alliance does not want them given long enough to do their job.

SHOULD we leave the European Union? Beware of answering yes.

About half the population would agree with you, but a senior figure at the BBC has decreed that you are 'mad'.

This was revealed in the Sunday Telegraph by former Today editor Rod Liddle, along with the fact that he was ordered to halt Frederick Forsyth's regular item because it was too 'Rightwing'.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Hearsay Can't Be the Basis for War


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?