Watching Brief: The Pro-War Newspapers Have Almost Ten Million Buyers, While the Anti-War Ones Have Fewer Than Three Million. So Can We Really Say That the Press Leads Public Opinion? (Columns)

By Platell, Amanda | New Statesman (1996), January 27, 2003 | Go to article overview

Watching Brief: The Pro-War Newspapers Have Almost Ten Million Buyers, While the Anti-War Ones Have Fewer Than Three Million. So Can We Really Say That the Press Leads Public Opinion? (Columns)


Platell, Amanda, New Statesman (1996)


Ever since the Sun placed Neil Kinnock's head inside a light bulb, there has been a myth that the newspapers, especially the red tops, determine public opinion. The belief that it was the Sun wot won the 1992 election for the Tories is partly responsible for the intellectual left's hatred of the tabloids and wholly responsible for new Labour's fear of them.

Yet most of us who have worked within the tabloid market know that successful newspapers reflect the views of their readers; they do not form them.

If proof were required, it comes with the latest polls on war with Iraq. An ICM poll for the Guardian reflects those conducted on an almost daily basis on talk radio and television. Support for war is falling. Outright opposition has risen to 47 per cent, and 81 percent demand a fresh United Nations mandate before they would support any military attack.

If the papers were, in fact, leading public opinion, these figures would be the other way around, as only the Daily Mirror, Guardian and Independent could really be described as anti-war newspapers. Their combined sales, at around 2.7 million, are eclipsed by the 3.4 million circulation of the Sun alone. The total sale of what can be described as the prowar newspapers totals almost ten million. Mass public opinion is creating a real commercial dilemma for many papers that are largely right-wing and pro-war. Their readers may be the former but, increasingly, they are not the latter.

Sunday nights are complete again with the return of Bremner, Bird and Fortune on Channel 4. Finally, someone has had the courage to take on David Blunkett, even if it was the Archbishop of Canterbury in a boxing ring.

The sketch with the Home Secretary and the archbishop left Rory Bremner's many admirers wondering who he had used as a body double for the rather flabby-chested Rowan Williams -- Blunkett's taut naked torso was clearly all Bremner. Alas, I have learnt that the preacher was also Rory, though I am assured he slouched and pushed out his stomach to create the effect. I must admit that I was rather hoping to discover a prosthetic paunch by way of explanation.

And they say she never talks. The Sun's new editor, Rebekah Wade, had a swift answer to the "will she or won't she drop page three" debate raging over her appointment this month. The first page three of her new editorship was a full-length, naked-except-for-a-pair-of-snakeskin-boots picture of Rebekah of Wapping (no, no, another Rebekah). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Watching Brief: The Pro-War Newspapers Have Almost Ten Million Buyers, While the Anti-War Ones Have Fewer Than Three Million. So Can We Really Say That the Press Leads Public Opinion? (Columns)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.