Letters

Clinical Psychiatry News, February 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Letters


The Biggest Drawback

I read with amazement Dr. Stephen R. Marder's comments in the article "Try Higher Doses of Atypicals Before Giving Up" (December 2002, p. 16).

Dr. Marder suggested that it is safe to use Zyprexa up to 60 mg/day and Seroquel up to 1,600 mg/day, with temporary sedation being the only drawback. I would suggest that the cost of these medications is a far greater drawback to their use.

Where I practice, the retail price for these doses would be $1,381.50 per month for Seroquel and $1,759.96 for Zyprexa. Who but the wealthy or those with incredibly generous insurance could afford such extravagance? I work at two state adolescent residential facilities, where the cost of medications comes out of the institutional budget. Since the advent of managed care and the demise of long-term inpatient psychiatric treatment, these institutions have become de facto hospitals. With many of our teens coming directly from acute hospital settings on multiple meds, we often cannot even continue their usual atypical antipsychotic doses, let alone try the exorbitant levels the article proposed.

At the risk of seeming harsh, Dr. Marder's comments sound like those of either an academician who has little appreciation for the realities of the clinical world of psychiatry or a pharmaceutical industry recipient who has been deluded into believing that the outrageous costs of these new psychotropics (and their resulting corporate profits) are justified.

Drug companies say that they need to recoup tremendous research and development costs, which are never actually demonstrated, only claimed.

We have a moral obligation to confront this kind of profiteering. We see every day how much the drug companies spend attempting to influence our clinical decisions in their favor. With the stakes so high, they will do almost anything, even fund apparently unbiased research studies and try to hide unfavorable clinical outcomes. The bottom line is this: We cannot trust an industry that stands to make astronomical profits by gaining our favor, and we must not dismiss these financial matters as irrelevant to clinical considerations. The best medicine in the world is no good if people cannot afford to use it, and the plain truth is that many can't, even in this country.

We should not tacitly support irresponsible medical corporate profiteering with this kind of clinical recommendation, at least not without providing a qualification.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Letters
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?