Too Much Talk, Not Enough Wind: The Government Talks Up the Potential of Renewable Energy Sources. but without Higher Subsidies, Burning Excrement May Prove to Be Our Only Hope. (Energy)

By Schoon, Nicholas | New Statesman (1996), February 24, 2003 | Go to article overview

Too Much Talk, Not Enough Wind: The Government Talks Up the Potential of Renewable Energy Sources. but without Higher Subsidies, Burning Excrement May Prove to Be Our Only Hope. (Energy)


Schoon, Nicholas, New Statesman (1996)


The present status of British renewable energy can be summed up in one word: "chickenshit". Last year, renewables supplied under 3 per cent of the electricity consumed in the UK. Most of it came from long-established hydroelectric plants in Scotland rather than from "new generation" renewables such as wind turbines. And when you consider that electricity meets less than a fifth of our total energy requirements, renewables then account for only about 0.5 per cent. We also compare poorly with our European neighbours. Spain gets 17 per cent of its electricity from renewables while the European Union average is 14 per cent.

Chicken shit itself, however, has more optimistic associations. Britain is a world leader in using the heat from burning poultry excrement to generate electricity. A UK-based company has built three power plants, with state backing, that burn the waste collected from miles around, making enough power for a city the size of Nottingham. With similar plants being built overseas, this is an exciting development in an otherwise uninspiring field.

Renewable energy technology has been talked up since the oil crisis that followed the Yom Kippur war 30 years ago. Oil and gas reserves will dwindle in the first half of this century, making these staple fuels increasingly expensive (Britain is about to move from being an exporter of gas, our single most important fuel, to an importer). And the reserves are increasingly concentrated in faraway, potentially unstable places.

Coal could supply our energy for much longer, but it produces even more of the carbon dioxide that warms the earth's atmosphere than gas. Even if we ignore global warming -- which is what the great majority of both rich and poor nations do -- fossil fuels also remain the main cause of air pollution. Although Britain has been tackling this pollution for decades, it still shortens thousands of lives each year.

So there have long been good reasons to favour a rapid expansion in renewables. The government now spends a lot of time and energy telling us about its pro-renewables policy. Why, then, in a country blessed with renewable energy resources such as stiff breezes, huge tidal ranges and powerful waves, are we such laggards in developing this potential?

One reason is that Britain lacks the easiest ways of harnessing renewable energy. We are short of serious mountain ranges, reducing the opportunity for hydroelectricity generated by rivers descending from great heights, and the simple rooftop solar water heaters used in many Mediterranean countries are still a great rarity in cloudy Britain.

Successive governments have failed to help renewables compete with fossil fuels -- by, for example, taxing them at a level that reflects the damage to people and the environment. The energy levy on business is a start, but it inevitably faces resistance from consumers and producers.

As renewable technologies are developed, reliability increases and price comes down. Wind farms in Britain s windiest areas can already compete with fossil fuel-generated electricity without subsidy--which is why they are the fastest growing source of renewable energy. For more than 20 years, however, Britain's energy policies have favoured open markets, minimal state intervention and the cheapest possible prices (petrol and diesel apart). Within that context, fossil fuels, which enjoy established markets, infrastructure and scale, are bound to win.

The lion's share of government backing for non-fossil fuel energy has always been with nuclear power, which is now pretty well bankrupt. Even if there is no further investment to replace those nuclear power stations closing down over the next 20 years -- and advocates of renewable energy, which competes for taxpayers' money with nuclear power must hope there is not--substantial sums will be needed to deal with their radioactive aftermath.

But all is not lost. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Too Much Talk, Not Enough Wind: The Government Talks Up the Potential of Renewable Energy Sources. but without Higher Subsidies, Burning Excrement May Prove to Be Our Only Hope. (Energy)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.