Judges Thwart Blunkett Purge of Asylum Claims; Fresh Court Setback for Home Secretary's Bid to Stem Bogus Refugees

By Butler, Jo | Daily Mail (London), March 19, 2003 | Go to article overview

Judges Thwart Blunkett Purge of Asylum Claims; Fresh Court Setback for Home Secretary's Bid to Stem Bogus Refugees


Butler, Jo, Daily Mail (London)


Byline: JO BUTLER

DAVID Blunkett suffered another humiliating blow at the hands of the judiciary yesterday as his asylum policy was ripped apart in the Court of Appeal.

The judges warned that new rules stripping benefits from asylum seekers who delayed lodging their claims have been applied too harshly.

They refused to overturn an earlier High Court ruling in favour of six asylum seekers left destitute by the draconian policy and ordered the Home Secretary to overhaul it.

The judgment is a major setback for Mr Blunkett, who wants to halve the number of asylum seekers coming to the UK by introducing tough measures to deter bogus claims. A record 111,000 asylum seekers entered last year.

Last month Mr Justice Collins, in the High Court, ruled that the controversial policy to deny benefits to late claimants was a breach of human rights because it risked leaving them destitute.

That triggered a furious response from Mr Blunkett who declared he was 'fed up' with judges overturning laws passed by Parliament and vowed to challenge the ruling.

The regulations, introduced in January, made it compulsory for asylum seekers to lodge claims 'as soon as practicable' after entering the UK if they wanted free housing and state support.

The aim is to stop the huge numbers of claims - up to 60 per cent - from people who have waited weeks or even months before coming forward, many waiting until their visas run out or they are caught living here illegally, according to Ministers.

But Court of Appeal judges Lord Phillips, the Master of the Rolls, and Lords Justice Sedley and Clarke ruled the procedure to work out whether someone had just arrived or was trying to play the system 'was not fair or operated fairly' and needed to be 'radically overhauled'.

It was not fair for claimants simply to fill out questionnaires.

Instead, they should be interviewed by trained interrogators to establish why they had not claimed on arrival - and whether they were telling the truth.

Applicants refused support should also have the chance to challenge the decision.

On these grounds the judges dismissed Mr Blunkett's appeal.

But they did accept that if the proper checks were made, the Home Secretary was entitled to withdraw benefits from those who had delayed making claims with no good reason. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Judges Thwart Blunkett Purge of Asylum Claims; Fresh Court Setback for Home Secretary's Bid to Stem Bogus Refugees
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.