Residential Proximity to Traffic and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996. (Children's Health)

By Wilhelm, Michelle; Ritz, Beate | Environmental Health Perspectives, February 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Residential Proximity to Traffic and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996. (Children's Health)


Wilhelm, Michelle, Ritz, Beate, Environmental Health Perspectives


We reported previously that increases in ambient air pollution in the Los Angeles basin increased the risk of low weight and premature birth. However, ambient concentrations measured at monitoring stations may not take into account differential exposure to pollutants found in elevated concentrations near heavy-traffic roadways. Therefore, we used an epidemiologic case-control study design to examine whether residential proximity to heavy-traffic roadways influenced the occurrence of low birth weight (LBW) and/or preterm birth in Los Angeles County between 1994 and 1996. We mapped subject home locations at birth and estimated exposure to traffic-related air pollution using a distance-weighted traffic density (DWTD) measure. This measure takes into account residential proximity to and level of traffic on roadways surrounding homes. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) for being LBW and/or preterm per quintile of DWTD. The dearest exposure-response pattern was observed for preterm birth, with an RR of 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.15] for infants in the highest DWTD quintile. Although higher risks were observed for LBW infants, exposure-response relations were less consistent. Examining the influence of season, we found elevated risks primarily for women whose third trimester fell during fall/winter months (O[R.sub.term LBW] = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.16-1.67; O[R.sub.preterm and LBW] = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.03-1.48; R[R.sub.all preterm] = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), and exposure-response relations were stronger for all outcomes. This result is consistent with elevated pollution in proximity to sources during more stagnant air conditions present in winter months. Our previous research and these latest results suggest exposure to traffic-related pollutants may be important. Key words: air pollution, epidemiology, low birth weight, preterm birth, traffic density. Environ Health Perspect 111:20-216 (2003). [Online 4 November 2002]

doi: 10.1289/ehp.5688 available via http://dx.doi.org/

**********

Epidemiologic studies addressing the relationship between ambient air pollution and fetal development are accumulating worldwide. Studies conducted in China (Wang et al. 1997; Xu et al. 1995), Brazil (Pereira et al. 1998), the Czech Republic (Bobak and Leon 1999; Dejmek et al. 1999; Perera et al. 1999), Mexico (Loomis et al. 1999), Korea (Ha et al. 2001), and the United States (Woodruff et al. 1997) linked ambient air pollution exposure during pregnancy with term low birth weight (LBW), intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), preterm birth, and perinatal mortality. We recently reported that increases in carbon monoxide, particulate matter < 10 lam in aerodynamic diameter (P[M.sub.10]), and ozone concentrations during vulnerable pregnancy periods increased the risk of term LBW (Ritz and Yu 1999), preterm delivery (Ritz et al. 2000), and certain cardiac malformations, such as ventricular septal defects (Ritz et al. 2002). CO is released directly in motor vehicle exhaust and does not react readily in the atmosphere to form other compounds. Fine (< 2.5 lam) and ultrafine (< 0.1 [micro]m) particles are also released directly in vehicle exhaust but undergo physical and chemical transformations in the atmosphere as they disperse from the roadway (Zhu et al. 2002). The consistently observed associations between ambient CO concentrations and adverse birth outcomes in our previous studies suggest that compounds in motor vehicle exhaust (either CO or associated compounds such as fine and ultrafine particles) may affect fetal development.

In our previous studies (Ritz and Yu 1999; Ritz et al. 2000, 2002), air pollution exposure assessment was based on measurements taken at ambient monitoring stations during specific pregnancy periods. Although such measures may adequately reflect average exposure of pregnant women to background air pollution concentrations in their neighborhood, they may not take into account differential exposure within neighborhoods due to proximity to heavy-traffic roadways and freeways.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Residential Proximity to Traffic and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996. (Children's Health)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?