The Impacts of Deregulation and Agricultural Restructuring for Rural Australia

By Vanclay, Frank | Australian Journal of Social Issues, February 2003 | Go to article overview

The Impacts of Deregulation and Agricultural Restructuring for Rural Australia


Vanclay, Frank, Australian Journal of Social Issues


As a leader in the Cairns Group of Nations, Australia has been advancing deregulation in agri-food trade. Successive governments have assumed that Australia would benefit from a greater deregulation of international trade because this would allow increased access to world markets for primary agricultural commodities. But regulation exists, at least in Europe, to protect the social value of the rural landscape. Australian governments, strongly influenced by economic rationalist ideology, have given insufficient consideration to the rural social landscape. Little critical reflection has taken place about whether Australia, and its farmers, would actually benefit from deregulation, or what the social impacts of this trend might be. Deregulation inevitably invokes structural adjustment, forces farmers out of agriculture, depopulates rural areas, and creates social hardship. There are also environmental ramifications. The exit of farmers from agriculture has not been as fast as was expected by economists and policy-makers, with many farmers adapting to new situations.

Introduction

This paper considers one dimension of globalisation, deregulation in agriculture, and its impacts on rural Australia. The restructuring of agriculture is a primary outcome of deregulation and is itself a major cause of impact on rural communities. Deregulation and restructuring are only two aspects of the complex phenomenon of globalisation (see Gray and Lawrence 2001, Tonts 2000). While globalisation may bring many benefits, it also has adverse impacts, which--although aired by demonstrators at World Trade Organisation (WTO) meetings, outside the World Bank, and at various economic summits, and which arguably spawned the One Nation Party--are not seriously considered by many economic analysts (an exception is Dragun and Tisdell 1999). This paper will concentrate on deregulation and restructuring in agriculture and their effects on rural Australia. Market reform, including the abolition of subsidies and protection, is a major part of globalisation. The argument is that it is inefficient to protect or subsidise industries, and that such practices distort the economy. Whatever the logic, since Australian agriculture developed in a protectionist regime, the structural adjustment that is occurring now is having a large social impact on rural people and on the environment. The logic of globalisation and the logic promoting deregulation and structural adjustment fails to consider the externalities--the social and environmental consequences that escape a market analysis. Even if the end-state was desirable--and that would depend on the values of the analyst and the way the change actually occurs--there is considerable hurt induced through the process of change. Over the last 20 years or so, rural Australia has experienced that change and that hurt, what Gray and Lawrence (2001) call a "global misfortune".

Some farmers have seized opportunities, invested in non-traditional crops, developed niche markets for higher value commodities, or otherwise benefited from globalisation. Others have exited agriculture and have serviced the growing tourism industry in rural areas (often amidst the scorn of their peers). Despite all the success stories, restructuring of agriculture has meant the exit from agriculture of about a quarter of Australia's farmers (1), about 2,000 every year (Garnaut and Lim-Applegate 1998), and it has meant new challenges for continuing farmers. Even if those who exit are better off--as is claimed by some anecdotal and research evidence--the process leading up to the decision to quit the farm is very painful (Bryant 1992). And while some continuing farmers are adapting and profiting from the new challenges, others (probably the majority) are finding the going tough (Gray and Lawrence 2001).

The implications of globalisation on agriculture are only one element in the multiple economic and political tiers of globalisation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impacts of Deregulation and Agricultural Restructuring for Rural Australia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.