A Real Hoot-a-Toot-Toot from Snark-Snappy Arlen Specter

By McNickle, Colin | Tribune-Review/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, April 22, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Real Hoot-a-Toot-Toot from Snark-Snappy Arlen Specter


McNickle, Colin, Tribune-Review/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review


Apparently what's good for the Specter is not so good for the Gonzales. As in Sen. Arlen Specter and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, that is.

Mr. Specter, full of interruptions and accusations, could hardly wipe the smirk off of his snarlin' Arlen face Thursday as he finally got to take his face-to-face public potshots at Mr. Gonzales before the Senate Judiciary Committee. And the mission of the five-term Pennsylvanian, the committee's ranking Republican member, was clear from the outset:

= To either get the attorney general to contradict past statements about his level of participation in perfectly legal firings of eight U.S. attorneys and further damage his credibility already eroded by the admittedly sloppy execution and public explanation of those firings;

= Or to force him to admit he was an out-of-touch supervisor (versus a delegator who trusted his lieutenants) who had poor control of his department and its charges, somebody who might have even "fallen victim" to the supposedly overzealous actions of one or two or three rogue underlings doing the "political bidding" of, if not the White House, that horrible, horrible man named Karl Rove.

Of course, Specter got things off to a snark-snappy start by stating a false premise:

"The purpose of this Senate oversight hearing is to determine this committee's judgment as to whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should continue in that capacity," Specter said in opening remarks. "This is a reconfirmation hearing."

Never mind that's not the way the confirmation of Cabinet members works; once you're confirmed, as Gonzales was two years ago, you're in, babe, until the president says you're out.

That said, the Judiciary Committee could vote to recommend a full Senate impeachment trial against the attorney general -- if the House of Representatives had voted any articles of impeachment and transmitted them to the upper chamber.

Don't recall that happening, do you? And on what grounds, pray tell, would an impeachment be based? Exercising a clear and legal presidential prerogative in a perhaps muddy but still legal matter?

Just to reiterate that salient fact here -- federal prosecutors serve at the sole pleasure of the president. You can be dismissed for anything from not being with the administration's program to having a sloppy knot in your tie or a runner in your stockings.

And, oh, yes, so much for Specter's fealty to the separation of powers doctrine: He wants to run the Justice Department, serve as its inspector general, then sit as grand jury, prosecutor and judge and trial jury. Whew!

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Real Hoot-a-Toot-Toot from Snark-Snappy Arlen Specter
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?