Tulsa Conference Unleashes Heated Debate over State Immigration Law

By Davis, KirLee | THE JOURNAL RECORD, March 1, 2008 | Go to article overview

Tulsa Conference Unleashes Heated Debate over State Immigration Law


Davis, KirLee, THE JOURNAL RECORD


Sebastian Lantos called Oklahoma's new immigration law inhuman, unethical, and immoral. Kris Kobach said it helped Oklahoma comply with several key federal immigration laws.

Francisco Trevino equated it to racism. Kobach thought it humanizing and fair.

Linda Allegro referred to state House Bill 1804 as our best example of a policy of exclusion. Kobach, who preferred the Arizona law for a case study, said both experiments proved effective at freely encouraging people to obey the law.

The University of Tulsa's broad investigation of state and federal immigration law trends Friday could not escape the divisive shadow of Oklahoma's controversial law. The Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law Symposium saw panelists voice criticism of 1804 in almost every program. The panel on inclusivity or exclusivity quickly emerged a lopsided tag-team match, with almost every point debated.

"When immigration laws are enforced poorly, that's when claims of inhumanity are raised most," said Kobach, a professor of law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law.

From his insights as the director of U.S. Department of Justice efforts to tighten border security and immigration rules of law after the 2001 terrorist attacks, and as senior counsel at the Immigration Reform Law Institute in Washington, D.C., Kobach said the new laws in Oklahoma and Arizona try to rectify perceived problems by augmenting inadequate federal enforcement resources with local resources and tapping electronic databases that nullify fraudulent documentation.

Kobach estimated the number of people unlawfully in the United States at anywhere from 12 million to 20 million - representing not just Hispanic, but many other ethnic backgrounds and cultures. That to Kobach broadened the issue beyond race, although it did not lessen other panelist protests, many seeing the law as profiling Hispanics.

"Oklahoma has become ground zero to see if this works," said Lantos, the owner of the translation services company Sebastian Lantos LLC. "We want safe borders. We want people to check out and we agree with the rule of the law. But we have to change the law."

Linda Allegro, a TU visiting assistant professor of political science, said 1804's denial of local and state services to illegal residents and increased local enforcement of immigration laws opened the doors to selective and unfair targeting. She added the refrain that 1804 was to encourage legalization only shielded its backers from racism allegations.

Kobach said the bill offered an alternative from the only other perceived options: mass roundups of illegals or granting mass amnesty, which he equated to simply rewarding people for breaking the law.

"No other area of law uses that dichotomy," he said, making comparisons from drunk driving to theft. "Most areas of law ratchet up enforcement."

Kobach compared 1804 to placing a traffic cop at a known speeding zone - which leads to changed behavior due to the realistic probability of enforcement.

Huyen Pham, associate professor of law at Texas Wesleyan University, spoke of the difficulties in charting the effects of recent state and local immigration efforts, although that didn't keep others from trying.

Since HB 1804 took effect Nov. 1, more than 25,000 Hispanics voluntarily left Oklahoma for new homes in neighboring states or their native lands, said Allegro. Lantos estimated 30,000 had left just the Tulsa area.

Both Allegro and Kobach called that voluntary deportation, but where Allegro said it reflected a policy of exclusion, Kobach said it provides the most economical solution.

"By definition, immigration laws are exclusive," he said, a reality forced on nations by difficult resource allocation choices. "Every country on earth wants control on those people."

Kobach said our nation's efforts to increase security after 9/11 illustrated how the federal government had no system of immigration departure controls. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Tulsa Conference Unleashes Heated Debate over State Immigration Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.