Law Report: Student Should Not Be Left out of Apportionment of Rent for Benefit Purposes ; 25 July 2002 Regina (on the Application of Naghshbandi) V Camden London Borough Council and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1038) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Schiemann, Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Jackson) 19 July 2002

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), July 25, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Report: Student Should Not Be Left out of Apportionment of Rent for Benefit Purposes ; 25 July 2002 Regina (on the Application of Naghshbandi) V Camden London Borough Council and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1038) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Schiemann, Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Jackson) 19 July 2002


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


WHEN APPORTIONING rent among those people liable for payment of rent on a property pursuant to regulation 10(5) of the Housing Benefits (General) Regulations 1987 for the purposes of determining whether housing benefit might be payable, a full time student should not be excluded from the apportionment.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Simin Naghshbandi against a decision that Camden London Borough Council had correctly apportioned the rent payable on his property for the purposes of assessing his entitlement to housing benefit.

The claimant was jointly liable with his wife, mother-in-law, son and daughter for the rent on the property in which they all lived. The claimant claimed housing benefit, which was assessed by the local authority on the basis that each of the father, mother, mother- in-law, son and daughter was liable for one-fifth of the rent.

The claimant applied for judicial review of that decision, contending that his son, as a full-time student, should have been excluded from the calculation.

For the purposes of determining whether housing benefit was payable, regulation 10(5) of the Housing Benefits (General) Regulations 1987 provided that where more than one person was liable to make payments in respect of a dwelling, the payments "should be apportioned for the purpose of calculating the eligible rent for each such person".

It was common ground that the claimant's son, as a full-time student, was not entitled to claim housing benefit by virtue of regulation 48A of the Regulations, which provided that in apportioning rent for which housing benefit might be payable, a full- time student should "be treated as if he were not liable to make payments in respect of a dwelling".

The claimant argued that the deeming provision in regulation 48A was, on the face of it, of general application and applied to any part of the Regulations where his liability to make payment was relevant, and that he was, therefore, not "such [a] person" for the purposes of regulation 10(5).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Report: Student Should Not Be Left out of Apportionment of Rent for Benefit Purposes ; 25 July 2002 Regina (on the Application of Naghshbandi) V Camden London Borough Council and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1038) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Schiemann, Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Jackson) 19 July 2002
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?