The Winner Takes All While Losers Face Oblivion in the Modern Game of Politics ; the Traditional Analysis of Swings to the Left or Right around a Basic Struggle for the Centre No Longer Seems to Apply

By Hamilton, Adrian | The Independent (London, England), November 8, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Winner Takes All While Losers Face Oblivion in the Modern Game of Politics ; the Traditional Analysis of Swings to the Left or Right around a Basic Struggle for the Centre No Longer Seems to Apply


Hamilton, Adrian, The Independent (London, England)


Should you feel sorry for the Tory party - and it is difficult not to at the moment - think of the poor Democrats in the US. Two years ago they lost an election by a couple of dimpled chads. In the mid-term elections this week they should have been just as close, if not victors. Yet now they are a party defeated, dispersed and disillusioned. Without a natural leader, few give them a chance even to challenge President Bush in the next election. Like the Republicans during Clinton's presidency, or the Democrats during Reagan's, they have been cast into the uttermost depths of irrelevancy.

And you can say the same of the opposition in France and Spain. The French Socialist party has not just lost the election against Chirac, it has been thrown on to the Tory-type margins of accelerating loss of public support and intensifying internecine warfare. Only in Germany is there any sense that we are still in a two-horse race for the electoral stakes.

None of the traditional explanations for this world of "winner takes all" seem to work. The analysis of swings to the left or the right around a basic struggle for the centre doesn't seem to apply. If that was what we were witnessing, then the Tories wouldn't be facing wipe-out in Britain, nor would the conservatives have been massacred in Canada. There have always been exceptions to general swings, but not this see-saw of oblivion.

You can't put it down entirely to an unideological age kept sweet by the cash registers of economic growth. The economies of the Western states are not in good shape. All the surveys suggest that, even in America, the consumer has become extremely nervous. By the normal law that votes follow the graphs of disposable income, Gerhard Schroder, the German leader, should have been out on his ear in Germany, and America should have seen a sizeable protest vote in the mid-term elections. Neither happened.

Nor is there a shortage of hard issues on which opinions are deeply divided. Just the opposite. The prospect of waging war against Iraq has brought out passionate politicking. Mr Schroder probably wouldn't have kept power without it. In the US mid-term elections, no one was in any doubt that the Republicans were offering a hard-line rightist agenda on the environment, health and welfare - all the traditional issues for which the threatened interest groups would be expected to turn out in force. They didn't.

No, you can't explain the misfortunes of the losers in today's politics on the pre-emption of the centre by governing parties. If that were so Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister who has made anti-union business-friendly economics the core of his agenda, wouldn't be riding high, and nor would President Bush in the United States. What we are seeing here is a quite different phenomenon, the rise and rise of managerial politics.

Elections, politics indeed, have been reduced to a spectator sport in which the excitement is in the race when it is close and disappears once there is a result. Like a successful football team, the winner tries to build on success by taking in all the best players and building the best facilities. The loser, its sponsorship slipping, faces the prospect of a vicious cycle of decline in receipts, talent and attendances that drives it out of the league altogether. By-elections, mid-term elections and European contests attract such a poor turnout because they don't make any difference to the results of the main event.

Party membership - the fans willing to turn out - has been on the decline for years, decades in truth.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Winner Takes All While Losers Face Oblivion in the Modern Game of Politics ; the Traditional Analysis of Swings to the Left or Right around a Basic Struggle for the Centre No Longer Seems to Apply
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?