Tuesday Law Report: Incapacity Benefit Regulation Invalid Because Correct Procedure Not Followed ; 12 November 2002 Howker V Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1623) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Peter Gibson, Lord Justice Mance and Lady Justice Hale) 8 November 2002

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), November 12, 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Tuesday Law Report: Incapacity Benefit Regulation Invalid Because Correct Procedure Not Followed ; 12 November 2002 Howker V Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1623) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Peter Gibson, Lord Justice Mance and Lady Justice Hale) 8 November 2002


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


REGULATION 27 of the Social Security (Incapacity for Work and General Amendments) Regulations 1996 had been made without a formal reference to the Social Security Advisory Committee, the committee having decided on the basis of incorrect information given by the Department of Social Security that no reference was necessary, and the regulation was therefore invalid.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of Eric Howker against the decision of a social security commissioner that he was no longer entitled to incapacity benefit.

The claimant had been in receipt of incapacity benefit. He was entitled to it by virtue of the exception to the "all work test" in regulation 27(b) of the Social Security (Incapacity for Work) (General) Regulations 1995, namely that he should be treated as incapable for work if, in the opinion of a doctor appointed by the Secretary of State, he suffered from some specific disease or disablement which would cause a risk to his health if he was found capable of work.

In R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex p Moule (12 September 1996, unreported) it was held that regulation 27 was invalid. The Department of Social Security accordingly proposed alterations to regulation 27.

By virtue of section 172 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 the Secretary of State was required to refer proposals for certain regulations to the Social Security Advisory Committee.

The committee and the department had adopted a procedure whereby proposed amendments were referred to the committee on an informal basis so that the the committee could decide whether it wished them to be referred formally under section 172 or whether it agreed under section 173 that they should not be referred.

At a meeting of the committee an official of the department explained that those who had fallen into the category covered by regulation 27(b) of the 1995 Regulations would be covered by other provisions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Tuesday Law Report: Incapacity Benefit Regulation Invalid Because Correct Procedure Not Followed ; 12 November 2002 Howker V Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Another ([2002] EWCA Civ 1623) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Peter Gibson, Lord Justice Mance and Lady Justice Hale) 8 November 2002
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?