Mr Prescott Has Betrayed His Own Tough Rhetoric ; the March of Concrete over the Remaining Green Places in the South- East Seems Inexorable

By Walter, Natasha | The Independent (London, England), February 6, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Mr Prescott Has Betrayed His Own Tough Rhetoric ; the March of Concrete over the Remaining Green Places in the South- East Seems Inexorable


Walter, Natasha, The Independent (London, England)


Here comes the first building boom for a generation. Not before time, many would say, as John Prescott announced yesterday that land will be released for the building of hundreds of thousands of homes in the South-east over the next 30 years. But while the homes are needed, the struggle to build them will run into emotive protests. Because, although many of these homes will be built on land that has been previously developed, many thousands will be built in some of the last green places of southern England.

At first sight, there is a tragic inevitability about this. Despite greenbelt regulations, houses are creeping all over wooded hills and grassy fields in the South-east. I remember visiting one such proposed development in Hockley Wood, in Essex, a few years ago, which was being opposed by a well-organised and well- publicised protest. This part of Hockley was, in the developers' eyes, just empty, muddy space, ripe for development. For the protesters, it was a precious place full of well-known trees and ponds and badger setts and brambles they wanted to save for themselves and their children.

I remember visiting the protesters' benders, and being shown around their proudest achievement - a tunnel complete with a door that locked on with steel cables, built by the self-styled "best tunnel builder in Britain", a young man called Ed. The protesters were full of optimism, believing that their emotion and their solidarity would win out over the hard-headed views of the developers.

Now, three years later, the protesters have gone, the tunnel has gone, the badgers have gone, and new residents have moved into their new homes: three-, four- and-five bedroom houses with large gardens and space to park a couple of cars. The houses go for up to half a million pounds. They are just what people in the South-east aspire to, a spacious home in a quiet location within driving distance of London, with a few birds still singing in a few remaining trees.

Although this march of concrete over these few remaining green places seems inexorable, there is a vision that promises to get us out of this need to pour concrete over all our woods and wild places. The buzzwords of this vision are "brownfield" and "density" - the plan is to build closely packed houses on land that wasn't too nice to start with. Visionaries such as Richard Rogers have long been pointing to the pleasures of high- density urban living, in Bloomsbury or downtown Amsterdam, where people live cheek by jowl but see their areas as desirable and fun to live in.

John Prescott has tried to incorporate some of this vision into his new programme. But will it be enough, and will it work? Although 60 per cent of the new development is slated to be on brownfield sites, that still means 40 per cent of an awful lot of houses slicing through green places. And although he has been talking tough on density for a long time, he seems to be shying away from tough action. For instance, last year Prescott was giving interviews in which he told journalists that he was "preparing a tough new planning regime" in which "builders will be ordered to incorporate high densities into future projects in the South".

At the moment, the average density in the South-east for new building is 22 dwellings per hectare. Richard Rogers, in Towards an Urban Renaissance, argued that 35-45 dwellings per hectare would work very well as a baseline. Other architects and planners have been suggesting that much, much higher densities can be desirable. But Prescott's new programme only reiterates an old promise to try to hold developers above 30 dwellings per hectare. "In future, applications to develop larger sites for new housing at below 30 dwellings per hectare will be liable to be called in and will have to be justified following public enquiry".

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Mr Prescott Has Betrayed His Own Tough Rhetoric ; the March of Concrete over the Remaining Green Places in the South- East Seems Inexorable
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?