EDITORIAL & OPINION: ANALYSIS - THE IRAQ CONFLICT Can the Geneva Convention Still Protect PoWs?

By Roberts, Adam | The Independent (London, England), March 25, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

EDITORIAL & OPINION: ANALYSIS - THE IRAQ CONFLICT Can the Geneva Convention Still Protect PoWs?


Roberts, Adam, The Independent (London, England)


There were good reasons for the US government to express concern over the fate of prisoners held in Iraqi hands - as it did on Sunday in response to the capture, and display on Al-Jazeera and Iraqi television, of the five soldiers who had been captured near Nasiriyah. Iraq's record of treating prisoners is dire.

The immediate occasion for concern about the US prisoners was the videotape footage of them under questioning. According to reports, the full tapes are deeply shocking. The broadcasts undoubtedly constituted a violation of article 13 of the 1949 Geneva PoW Convention, which expressly provides that PoWs "must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity".

The more fundamental reason for the concern about the prisoners is that there is a long history of Iraqi mistreatment and torture of PoWs. In the war between Iraq and Iran of 1980-88, the huge numbers of prisoners on both sides were often treated in a manner that violated the Geneva Convention. There was excessive use of force by camp guards, especially in Iraq. After that war both sides were slow to repatriate prisoners, and many remain unaccounted for to his day.

In the 1991 Gulf War, coalition prisoners in Iraqi hands were treated in a manner inconsistent with the convention, and many, perhaps even most, were tortured. Iraq paraded captured airmen on TV, and used prisoners as human shields. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was denied access. All this was in violation of the convention.

Against this grim background, there are bound to be questions about whether the Geneva Conventions offer any realistic hope of humane treatment for prisoners captured in this war - or of mitigating the horrors of war more generally. The humane treatment of PoWs has featured in international treaties on the laws of war since at least the 18th century. The 1949 Geneva Conventions, negotiated by representatives of states and of their armed forces, incorporate the experience of the Second World War - particularly the need to specify in unambiguous detail what should, and what should not, be done to PoWs.

The rules reflect practical as well as ethical considerations: there is no point in punishing those no longer able to fight; humane treatment may actually encourage soldiers to surrender; decent treatment of captives may lead to reciprocity in the treatment of one's own forces.

The particular rule against exposing prisoners to "insults and public curiosity" has become important in debates about PoWs because many violations of it are, by their very nature, highly publicised. In 1966, North Vietnam showed film of US prisoners being paraded through the streets of Hanoi, where they were exposed to public wrath. In the 1999 war over Kosovo between the US-led coalition and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, captured American servicemen were shown on TV, leading to protests similar to those of recent days.

In these cases, a reason for the showing of captured PoWs on TV appears to have been that this is one way a less developed state, under airborne assault from a militarily superior adversary, can demonstrate that it has some power. By extracting statements and confessions, it can help to reinforce popular hatred of the adversary.

Although there is widespread agreement that the public exposure of prisoners in these cases was a violation of article 13, what about other cases? Is any photo or videotape showing captured PoWs a violation? There is no general and unambiguous answer to such questions. The authoritative ICRC volume of commentary on the Geneva PoW Convention offers no assistance on this matter. The actual practice seen in modern wars may be the best guide. If a practice is accepted by other states it may come to be considered legal.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

EDITORIAL & OPINION: ANALYSIS - THE IRAQ CONFLICT Can the Geneva Convention Still Protect PoWs?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?