Law Report: Appointment of Special Independent Counsel for Public Immunity Interest Hearing ; 14 November 2003 Regina V H and Another ([2003] EWCA Crim 2847) Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Rose, Mr Justice Penry- Davey and Mr Justice David Clarke) 16 October 2003

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), November 14, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Report: Appointment of Special Independent Counsel for Public Immunity Interest Hearing ; 14 November 2003 Regina V H and Another ([2003] EWCA Crim 2847) Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Rose, Mr Justice Penry- Davey and Mr Justice David Clarke) 16 October 2003


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


IN THE few exceptional criminal cases where material was so sensitive that the defence could not be informed that a public interest immunity (PII) hearing was to take place, or in which a judge in a PII hearing learned of material which was so highly prejudicial to a defendant that he should not make a ruling depending on the material without the benefit of further adversarial comment upon it, the judge could and should invite the Attorney General to appoint special independent counsel.

The Court of Appeal allowed the Crown's appeal against a ruling made in a preparatory hearing regarding the appointment of special independent counsel for a PII hearing.

At a preparatory hearing under section 29(1) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 to expedite the trial of five defendants on a charge of conspiracy to supply heroin, the judge ruled, inter alia, that a special independent counsel should be appointed to introduce an adversarial element to a PII hearing.

The ruling was made in order to avoid a possible violation of article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, in the light of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Edwards and another v United Kingdom [2003] All ER (D) 368 (Jul).

The Crown appealed under section 35(1) of the Act against the ruling, contending that the principle in Edwards should be confined to those cases (of which the present case was not one) where the trial judge made an important determinative ruling based on or having taken into account undisclosed PII material, and that the judge had been premature and wrong to seek the appointment of special independent counsel when he did.

Leonard Smith and Jonathan Lennon for H; Robin Howat and Tania Tagon for C; David Perry and Sean Morris (Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Report: Appointment of Special Independent Counsel for Public Immunity Interest Hearing ; 14 November 2003 Regina V H and Another ([2003] EWCA Crim 2847) Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Lord Justice Rose, Mr Justice Penry- Davey and Mr Justice David Clarke) 16 October 2003
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?