Ideology Buckles - It's Too Rigid, Too Flawed. Better by Far to Muddle On

By Lott, Tim | The Independent on Sunday (London, England), October 26, 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Ideology Buckles - It's Too Rigid, Too Flawed. Better by Far to Muddle On

Lott, Tim, The Independent on Sunday (London, England)

We must accept the random, says Tim Lott, because our invented systems lack flexibility

After the last traumatic weeks spent watching the near-fatal buffeting of the world economic system, it was fascinating to read of the commensurate bruising endured by the mind of one of the principal architects of that system, the neo-liberal former head of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan.

Greenspan admitted to a congressional committee last week - after the collapse of the 40 years of economic experiment in the free market economics that he had done much to establish - that he was "shocked" at the failure of that model. He was "very distressed"; it was a "tsunami" that was "much broader than anything that could have been imagined". Most tellingly, he admitted that what he had believed in was an "ideology" which, he now recognised, contained a "flaw".

It is an extraordinary thing that such an intelligent man should be so shocked that an ideology contained a flaw. The shock came because, presumably, until the last few weeks, Greenspan didn't see what he believed in as being an ideology at all - that is to say, a self-contained, self-sustaining, supposedly coherent and hermetic system of belief. He saw what he thought constituted reality. But what he actually saw were patterns made out of smoke.

And that is why he is now reeling, along with the economies of the world and all of us that rely on them to keep our daily lives tractable. Because reality has revealed itself as too unpredictable and complex to contain within a single rigid body of ideas.

No ideologies really admit to being ideologies until they have failed. It wasn't only Greenspan but a whole generation of libertarian economic theorists who were gripped by a vision arising out of the failures of the centrist, statist "managed economies" of the 1970s.

The emergence of this mixed economy statism - too patchwork to be described as an ideology - was prophesied in a book called The End of Ideology by Daniel Bell in 1960. He observed that both the ideals of the left, in the form of socialism, and of the right, in the forms of fascism and militarism, had expired, leaving only the possibility of a raft of centrist, moderate and ad hoc compromise politics negotiated between competing centres of power.

This model - which came to be known in this country as corporatism - was seen to have failed after the inflation, economic stagnation and oil crises of the 1970s. Once again, a vacuum of ideas, or if you prefer, ideals, was waiting to be filled. And filled it was, this time by the libertarians, among them one Alan Greenspan.

This moment of the shift to the belief in economic libertarianism is captured in an article by the libertarian guru Murray Rothbard in 1977 in a journal called New Libertarian Forum. Pointing to the failure of centrist corporatist solutions, he observed that "all this provides an unusually favourable opportunity for libertarians. For we are functioning in an intellectual climate where there is no longer any real, determined, militant ideological competition. Ideological decay and confusion are everywhere. But, in this miasma, we libertarians have that alternative; we have a new and intellectually stimulating and fascinating ideological paradigm, and one that explains the collapse of modern statism better than anyone else. We have a new and systematic creed, and we are just about the only ones who still believe in our ideology. In contrast to the Left, Right, and Centre, our ideology hasn't ended; it is just beginning."

The triumph of the libertarian view came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, after which American-style free market economics was the only game in town. Francis Fukuyama, echoing Bell, published The End of History in 1992, asserting that democracies underpinned by capitalist economies were now the only realistic way to organise a society.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Ideology Buckles - It's Too Rigid, Too Flawed. Better by Far to Muddle On


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?