LEADING ARTICLE: The Ambiguity of Diplomacy ; THE MIDDLE EAST
When the Government wishes to make its position on an issue of particular sensitivity as clear as the thickest mud, it has the ideal man for the job. The Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, can be relied upon to lose his listeners within seconds, then leave utter confusion in his wake.
Thus we were not entirely sure, after he sat down in the Commons on Monday, whether the promised referendum on the European constitution was merely postponed or definitely off. Ditto, when he spoke yesterday about British diplomatic contacts with the Palestinian militant organisation, Hamas. Had British officials met representatives of Hamas or had they not? Was Britain softening its attitude to what the European Union has designated a terrorist organisation? It was hard to tell.
On this occasion, however, there was method in the muddle. Yes, junior British diplomats had met two members of Hamas, though not as representatives of that organisation but as elected mayors of their towns. And no, Britain had not softened its attitude to Hamas, because Britain, unlike the EU, distinguishes between the military and political wings of Hamas. It has proscribed the one but not the other, as with the IRA and Sinn Fein.
Mr Straw was also able to say categorically " and, we trust, accurately " that there would be no 'dealings' with Hamas leaders unless they …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: LEADING ARTICLE: The Ambiguity of Diplomacy ; THE MIDDLE EAST. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Independent (London, England). Publication date: June 8, 2005. Page number: 26. © 2009 The Independent - London. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.