FRIDAY LAW REPORT: Committal Proceedings for Contempt Unfair ; 13 MAY 2005 Phillips and Others V Symes and Others ([2005] EWCA Civ 553) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Pill and Lord Justice Longmore) 6 May 2005

By Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister | The Independent (London, England), May 13, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

FRIDAY LAW REPORT: Committal Proceedings for Contempt Unfair ; 13 MAY 2005 Phillips and Others V Symes and Others ([2005] EWCA Civ 553) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Pill and Lord Justice Longmore) 6 May 2005


Kate O'Hanlon, Barrister, The Independent (London, England)


Committal proceedings against the defendant for contempt of court had been conducted unfairly, and the term of imprisonment imposed by the judge was reduced to one year from two.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of Robin Symes against the length of a term of imprisonment imposed for contempt of court.

Mr Symes had been in partnership with the third claimant's brother, dealing in objets d'art and antiquities, until the partner's death and the consequent dissolution of the partnership. The other claimants were the administrators of the deceased partner's estate.

The claimants commenced proceedings against Mr Symes arising out of a dispute concerning assets alleged to be partnership assets. He was in breach of various court orders and undertakings made in the course of the proceedings, and a suspended sentence of one year's imprisonment for contempt of court was imposed on him in May 2003.

In March 2004, the claimants applied without notice for a disclosure order against Richard Slade, the defendant's former solicitor, in connection with, inter alia, the sale of a statue (the Slade proceedings).

The claimants thereafter applied for an order that Mr Symes be committed for contempt of court in that he had he had breached an undertaking to disclose certain information, and because there was evidence that he had sold the statute in breach of an order of the court. The judge adjourned the contempt hearing and set aside a day in January 2005 to enable Mr Symes to attend upon the claimants' legal representatives with a view to providing such further information as he was willing and able to provide on a number of issues.

He told Mr Symes that, if he co-operated, that would be taken into account in any sentence he decided to impose for the breaches. At the resumed hearing on 20 January, the judge declined to look at the transcripts of the interviews conducted with Mr Symes, but accepted the claimants' contention that he had not given any further information that would be of assistance.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

FRIDAY LAW REPORT: Committal Proceedings for Contempt Unfair ; 13 MAY 2005 Phillips and Others V Symes and Others ([2005] EWCA Civ 553) Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Lord Justice Pill and Lord Justice Longmore) 6 May 2005
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?