Judicial Review Was Available as a Remedy ; FRIDAY LAW REPORT 9 JUNE 2006 Regina (on the Application of Hafner and Others) V Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2006] EWHC1259 (Admin)) Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court (Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Mr Justice Keith) 26 May 2006

By Kate O'Hanlon | The Independent (London, England), June 9, 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Judicial Review Was Available as a Remedy ; FRIDAY LAW REPORT 9 JUNE 2006 Regina (on the Application of Hafner and Others) V Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2006] EWHC1259 (Admin)) Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court (Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Mr Justice Keith) 26 May 2006


Kate O'Hanlon, The Independent (London, England)


Decisions made in the exercise of the Secretary of State's discretion under sections 13(1), 14(1) and 15(1) of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 were, in principle, susceptible to judicial review.

The Divisional Court dismissed an application for judicial review by Benno Hafner and others in which it was sought to quash various decisions of the Secretary of State for the Home Department in connection with letters of request for information under the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003.

Mr Hafner was a Swiss lawyer practising in Zurich. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) was a statutory body responsible for monitoring and enforcing corporate law, the stock exchange and securities trading in Australia. It was carrying out an investigation involving three men who were alleged to have used two Swiss financial institutions to conceal their own beneficial ownership of shares in an Australian company.

Asic sought the assistance of the Secretary of State for the Home Department under the 2003 Act, requesting him to exercise his powers in sections 13, 14 and 15, as it was seeking information from various people who were working in London. The Secretary of State nominated Bow Street Magistrates' Court under section 15(1) of the Act.

Mr Hafner came to hear of the request and the fact that he would be referred to in written replies to questions and was referred to in the request documents. Mr Hafner or his firm, which was also a claimant, had acted for all but one of the persons named in the questions which accompanied the request.

His solicitors wrote to the Secretary of State indicating that the Secretary of State had acted unlawfully in the exercise of his discretion in the nomination of a court in that the proceedings in England were duplicative. They also asked to be provided with a copy of the request from Asic.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Judicial Review Was Available as a Remedy ; FRIDAY LAW REPORT 9 JUNE 2006 Regina (on the Application of Hafner and Others) V Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2006] EWHC1259 (Admin)) Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court (Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Mr Justice Keith) 26 May 2006
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?