Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Russia Misses out on Joys of Capitalism; China Doesn't

By: Markowitz, Jack | Tribune-Review/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, March 21, 2010 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Russia Misses out on Joys of Capitalism; China Doesn't


Markowitz, Jack, Tribune-Review/Pittsburgh Tribune-Review


Let us leave this scene of trillion-dollar deficits and out-of- whack public policy ... and go halfway around the world to view a couple of economic lessons at a distance, clearly:

How and why, for example, China's economy is doing so much better than Russia's.

Americans and Europeans buy untold billions worth of goods "Made in China" and almost nothing "Made in Russia." Yet they had the same chance. Both are former centrally planned Communist states, and the Chinese aren't even "former" yet. The party remains in charge even as economic progress runs circles around its dogmas.

The difference is this. The Chinese have -- and the Russians haven't -- created …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?