Crucial Case for Future of 'Charitable Choice' ; A Texas Court Will Decide When the US Can Legally Fund Church-Run Social Programs
Scott Baldauf, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor
On one idea at least, the two major presidential candidates, George W. Bush and Al Gore, can agree. Govern-ment should allow faith-based groups to take on more social services, from child care to worker training.
Yet the notion of "charitable choice," as it is called, is at the heart of a lawsuit in Texas that may determine the future of such church-led programs, and whether taxpayers should fund them.
The lawsuit, filed this week by a major Jewish organization and a Texas-based civil rights group, argues that Texas officials violated the constitutional separation of church and state by awarding a welfare-to-work contract to a consortium of Christian churches. The program in question, called Jobs Partnership of Washington County, offered Bible classes and urged the poor to build a personal relationship with Jesus, according to the complaint.
"I don't think the objection is about religious indoctrination," says Jim Harrington, executive director of the Texas Civil Rights Project in Austin. "It's when they cross the boundary and use these services either to proselytize or do it in such a way that you have to hear their religious message in order to receive the services. That's not the way it ought to work."
In the four years since the federal welfare overhaul was passed, hundreds of such programs have sprouted up across the country, so this case is certain to be watched closely. It's a case that pits two of America's most cherished concepts against each other: the belief that religion should keep its nose out of government matters, and the notion that churches can do much good in transforming individual lives and tackling major social ills.
Certainly, churches have been engaged in social services for decades, managing soup kitchens and ministering in prisons, among other things. Many Americans embrace that relationship. In a February poll by Zogby International of Utica, N.Y., 56 percent of the respondents favored using "a partnership of federal and religious and private organizations" to solve social problems.
"What this says is that we're not going to say no to anybody," says Alan Crockett, spokesman for Zogby.
These attitudes notwithstanding, faith-based social services are facing more and more legal challenges. In April, for instance, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State filed a suit against Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children, because the federally funded group fired a family specialist who was a lesbian.
"Churches have every right to provide social services," says the Rev. Barry Lynn, Americans United director. "But they may not receive tax funding if they discriminate on religious grounds."
Critics of the Jobs Partnership in Texas say this faith-based program had a distinctly sectarian feel to it. According to a 1999 evaluation of the program by the state Department of Human Services, Partnership's course materials were explicitly and emphatically Christian. Typical is one course, entitled "Who's the boss? All authority comes from God." …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Crucial Case for Future of 'Charitable Choice' ; A Texas Court Will Decide When the US Can Legally Fund Church-Run Social Programs. Contributors: Scott Baldauf, writer of The Christian Science Monitor - Author. Newspaper title: The Christian Science Monitor. Publication date: July 27, 2000. Page number: 3. © 2009 The Christian Science Publishing Society. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.