Immigration Policy, Not Politics
This week's US House of Representatives vote for temporary amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants is questionable on at least three counts.
First, granting such amnesty under a section of immigration law known as 245(i) amounts to allowing US immigration policy to be dictated by ethnic groups and their supporting business interests.
Second, it smacks more of politics than policy. The White House reportedly pushed the idea just in time for President Bush's upcoming meeting with Mexican President Vicente Fox at a UN development conference. A 245(i) extension should make Mr. Bush's compadre Mr. Fox more than a little happy. But with the deal now done, Bush should now use the extension vote as a lever to get Mexico to beef up its own border security.
Third, it heaps more work on an already overburdened Immigration and Naturalization Service at a time when heightened security measures are in place. The INS - red-faced again this week over news that it had mailed this month approval notices of student visa status to two of the principal Sept. 11 hijackers - clearly has more housecleaning to do.
Simply put, 245(i) is a provision in existing immigration law that grants permanent residency to some illegal immigrants deemed eligible to be in the US. All they have to do is get a family member or an employer to pay a $1,000 fine so they can get a green …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Immigration Policy, Not Politics. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Christian Science Monitor. Publication date: March 14, 2002. Page number: 10. © 2009 The Christian Science Publishing Society. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.