Abortion Protests Debated Does Racketeering Law Apply? Supreme Court Hears Arguments

By Compiled From News Services | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), December 9, 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Abortion Protests Debated Does Racketeering Law Apply? Supreme Court Hears Arguments


Compiled From News Services, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Abortion-rights advocates told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that some who oppose abortion have joined in a "nationwide campaign of terror" and, like Mafia mobsters, are violating a federal racketeering law.

But anti-abortion activists told the justices that subjecting abortion opponents to the racketeering law would harm their right to political protest.

The National Organization for Women and President Bill Clinton's Justice Department contended that lower courts had wrongly thrown out a NOW lawsuit that had invoked the disputed law against Operation Rescue, the Pro-Life Action League and other abortion foes.

The anti-abortion groups urged the justices to let the suit die.

Fay Clayton, a lawyer for NOW, told the justices that some protesters against abortion had used "forcible, violent conduct . . . any means necessary, including terrorism." She said such people call peaceful abortion protesters "wimps" and are more interested in "mob violence" than in protest.

She said NOW had no objection to anti-abortion advocates who legally picket, pray, hand out leaflets or petition Congress. "When (they) turn to the use of force and violence and the threat of force and violence . . . their advocacy can cross the line."

Clayton charged that the militant anti-abortion groups were "dedicated and committed to mob violence" that forces doctors at abortion clinics and women seeking abortions to surrender their legal rights.

Robert Blakey, the attorney for the groups sued by NOW, likened protesters who block access to clinics to civil rights and labor leaders who led boycotts. He cited the protests of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the civil rights leader, and Cesar Chavez, who started the farm labor movement with nonviolent action beginning in the 1960s.

Blakey helped write the racketeering law as a Senate aide in 1970. He said it was Congress' intent that it could be invoked only in situations involving "illicit gain." He said Congress had specified that the law would not cover the protests then raging over U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

He argued that Congress never had intended to stifle political dissent when it passed the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, or RICO, to attack organized crime.

Today, RICO is used in suits involving just about any business dispute. And in a series of prior rulings, the Supreme Court consistently refused to narrow the application of the broadly worded law.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Abortion Protests Debated Does Racketeering Law Apply? Supreme Court Hears Arguments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?