`Environmental Justice' Is Short-Term Many Targeted Facilities Are Where They Are Because of Demographic Conditions

By Christopher Boerner and Thomas Lambert | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), December 26, 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

`Environmental Justice' Is Short-Term Many Targeted Facilities Are Where They Are Because of Demographic Conditions


Christopher Boerner and Thomas Lambert, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


A new movement to achieve "environmental justice" has been gaining steam. It is motivated by the belief that minorities and the poor face greater exposure to pollution and hazardous substances than do other segments of society. Acknowledging this possibility, the Environmental Protection Agency has opened an investigation of environmental officials in Mississippi and Louisiana for allegedly violating Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. By merely demonstrating that differences in exposure exist, Title VI would enable EPA to deny companies building and operating permits and to withhold federal money destined for these states.

The situation turns out to be more complex than the advocates of environmental justice seem to realize. Many industrial facilities, which are the target of environmental racism claims, were situated where they were simply because of favorable demographic and geological conditions. In numerous instances, at the time facilities were built, the surrounding areas were rural or thinly populated. Major population expansion - including the arrival of minorities and poor people - came later. Changing demographics may increase a company's obligation to hear and address a local community's concerns, but using the new population distribution as grounds for claims of discrimination puts the cart before the horse.

Moreover, allowing racism cases to be based on effect regardless of intent serves a a strong disincentive for companies to locate and continue operating facilities in areas where "discrimination" suits would likely occur. The effects of such disincentives could be devastating to the local communities that reap the economic benefits of being host to industrial and waste facilities.

Consider the controversial Emelle landfill in Sumter County, Ala. While often identified as an instance of discriminatory siting, Emelle ended up in Sumter County because of the area's sparse population, arid climate and location atop a 700-foot deep natural chalk formation. These factors, along with millions of dollars in state-of-the-art technology make Emelle one of the world's safest landfills. Furthermore, the landfill provides 300 jobs (60 percent of which are held by Sumter County residents) as well as $4.2 million in annual tax revenue. This money has enabled the community to build a fire station and town hall, improve schools, upgrade the health-care delivery system and begin reversing the rates of illiteracy and infant mortality.

Using the catch-all charge of racism to force legitimate businesses out of communities like Sumter County denies economic benefits to those who most need them. Draconian environmental regulations have already devastated minority and inner-city communities. The depressed conditions of south-central Los Angeles, for example, are, in part, attributable to overly stringent air quality standards, which drove profitable businesses out of the city. Further decreasing the incentives for companies to locate in minority communities exacerbates the problems of poverty and unemployment - conditions far more unhealthy than the minute cancer risks associated with industrial and waste facilities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

`Environmental Justice' Is Short-Term Many Targeted Facilities Are Where They Are Because of Demographic Conditions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?