Study Lowers Toxic Threat to Minorities Area Researchers Contest `Environmental Justice'

By Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), April 6, 1994 | Go to article overview

Study Lowers Toxic Threat to Minorities Area Researchers Contest `Environmental Justice'


Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


IN FEBRUARY, President Bill Clinton ordered federal agencies to take steps to prevent low-income neighborhoods from suffering further toxic threats.

"All Americans have a right to be protected from pollution, not just those who can afford to live in the cleanest, safest communities," Clinton said while signing an executive order.

In Congress and state legislatures, bills aim to block dumping and waste incineration in neighborhoods inhabited mainly by minorities. Internationally, 66 nations teamed up two weeks ago to forbid the U.S. and industrial nations to export hazardous materials to developing nations. In short, "environmental justice" has become a catch phrase from county boards to the United Nations, with policy-makers working to prevent exploitative dumping and to correct problems from the past.

But the idea that minorities and disadvantaged people suffer disproportionate risk from pollution is coming under attack; the latest salvo has been fired from the Center for the Study of American Business at Washington University in St. Louis.

A new study by two research fellows, Christopher Boerner and Thomas Lambert, asserts that studies that gave birth to the environmental justice movement are flawed and that governments are misdirected in seeking remedies. The two conclude in the study - "Environmental Justice?" - that depressed areas should be encouraged to negotiate payments for becoming waste repositories and thereby improve people's lives.

"Many may argue that it is immoral to pay individuals to expose themselves to health risks," the study asserts. "(But) as long as environmental regulations guarantee minimal risk, there should be no moral difficulties with compensating individuals for voluntarily accepting the nuisances associated with waste and polluting facilities."

Copies of their study have been sent to the White House and distributed in Congress, and the authors hope that their arguments become part of the debates.

The study is the second in two weeks to try to debunk the concept of environmental justice and the efforts by governments to tackle problems that are often considered widespread. Last month, researchers at the University of Massachusetts published a study concluding that white working-class people, and not blacks, are more likely to live by waste facilities in the 25 largest metropolitan areas. That study, which analyzed census tracts, was partly funded by the waste-disposal industry.

In a release accompanying the study, the author, Douglas L. Anderton, asserted that "we found some relationships that run counter to the general wisdom of the day, and further research is needed on the question of environmental racism." The words environmental racism further inflame people who feel their rights and health are threatened by waste disposal. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Study Lowers Toxic Threat to Minorities Area Researchers Contest `Environmental Justice'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.