Editing and Censorship Aren't the Same

By Terry, John | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), June 5, 1994 | Go to article overview

Editing and Censorship Aren't the Same


Terry, John, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


The school paper at the University of Miami felt compelled to accept and run an ad claiming the Holocaust never happened, and because it did, a prospective donor said he's thinking about withholding a large donation he had pledged.

Good for him.

Newspaper editorialists who have criticized this would-be donor need to get a grip on their guilt and get over the notion that they're going back on a sacred oath if they don't provide a forum for crackpot ideas. Would any responsible newspaper - be it The New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle or the University of Miami's student newspaper - accept and run an ad advocating, say, a nuclear attack on Minneapolis? Or an ad saying all black people should he barred from going to college? How about an ad featuring a graphic depiction of a sex act?

Of course they wouldn't. So it is a mystery why the question of censorship - obviously not relevant to the above examples - should enter into the debate over an equally loony and thoroughly objectionable ad claiming the Holocaust never happened.

Acceptance or rejection of this ad, the editors of the paper should understand, has nothing to do with censorship. It has nothing to do with freedom of speech. And it has nothing to do with freedom of the press. It has to do with exercising the sort of judgment that every newspaper exercises every day - deciding what will and won't go into their paper. It's called editing.

Newspapers are not obliged to publish everything that's submitted to them, and they are not guilty of censorship when they don't. They turn away ads all the time, along with reams of editorial material, and no one accuses them of violating free speech or curtailing the expression of ideas. No one's rights are being violated when their woe goes unpublished, and no one would argue that freedom of speech is the same thing as unrestricted access to the mass media.

Freedom of speech means people can believe, and say, what they want, including ideas that most people find repugnant. But it doesn't mean they have the right to use somebody else's privately owned news medium to say it. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Editing and Censorship Aren't the Same
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.