Embryo Research: Walking a Fine Line NIH Weighs Medical Advances vs. Morals

By Marlene Cimons 1994, Los Angeles Times | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), September 27, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Embryo Research: Walking a Fine Line NIH Weighs Medical Advances vs. Morals

Marlene Cimons 1994, Los Angeles Times, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)

JANICE PEARSE, a nurse in Baltimore, Md., recalls her long quest to become pregnant using in vitro fertilization.e

The first time her eggs were mixed with her husband's sperm in a petri dish, and the doctor told her that embryos had been formed, was an exhilarating moment, because "it's the closest to having a baby you've ever been," she said.

But for every experimentally created embryo that is successfully implanted - and Pearse was one of the lucky ones who eventually became pregnant - thousands of unneeded embryos are frozen in storage or discarded.

If it is acceptable to create an embryo for transfer into a woman's uterus - as is now done in fertility clinics - is it ethical to experiment on an embryo in the lab? Or just throw it away?

These are among the troubling aspects of the new frontier of medical science known as human embryo research.

Many scientists believe that studying the human embryo - at one week a cluster of cells no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence - could yield infinite knowledge about nature's worst medical scourges.

But like any science involved with creating or manipulating human life, studying the human embryo has become the focus of an intense international debate and has raised numerous ethical questions:

What is the moral status of a human embryo?

Is it acceptable to make an embryo in the lab only to use it for research - especially when there are at least 12,000 embryos frozen in storage and countless others that get tossed away?

How far should research embryos be allowed to develop?

At what point does an embryo become a fetus?

What kinds of research are appropriate?

Last year, the National Institutes of Health asked a panel of outside experts to wrestle with these questions. Today, its members are scheduled to release guidelines for federally funded embryo research. The report will undergo further scrutiny within the National Institutes of Health and be the subject of a public meeting in December. Harold Varmus, who heads the institutes, will then make the final decision on what areas of research are acceptable for federal funding, and which guidelines should govern the work.

Although the panel is expected to endorse human embryo research, it probably will propose certain limitations.

The panel is expected to sanction the idea of pre-implantation diagnosis, for example, so parents concerned about genetic risks can choose in vitro fertilization and learn in advance whether an embryo carries an inherited disease. But the panel is expected to deem it unacceptable to use such a technique only to determine gender.

The panel also is likely to oppose cloning, or "twinning," experiments, and research that combines human and animal tissue. But the panel may conclude that parthenogenesis - a process that uses chemicals or electrical current to stimulate the development of an egg in the absence of sperm - may be valuable in understanding egg development. These so-called parthenotes die several days after they are generated and do not develop into embryos.

Regardless of the panel's recommendations, they almost certainly will be controversial.

Expressing the view of many scientists who are among the chief advocates of the research is professor Roger A.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Embryo Research: Walking a Fine Line NIH Weighs Medical Advances vs. Morals


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?