Ax Wielders Improve State Governments

By William D. Eggers and John O'Leary | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), November 23, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Ax Wielders Improve State Governments


William D. Eggers and John O'Leary, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Can the new governors deliver? That's the question after a whole slew of new GOP governors flooded into office promising to cut, chop and slash state budgets.

In New York, George Pataki pledged to cut the income tax rate by one-fourth. In Connecticut, John Rowland vowed to repeal the state's income tax by the year 2000. Republicans won a majority of governorships by advertising themselves as the party of budget choppers.

Their opponents had solemnly intoned that state governments absolutely, positively cannot operate with a cent less than they currently spend. "On the spending side, I don't see how you get from here to there," says Steve Gold, director of the Study of States, in Albany, N.Y.

History shows it can be done. In 1990, William Weld of Massachusetts was considered crazy for promising not to raise taxes in a state with an $850 million deficit. This year, he cruised to re-election with more than 70 percent of the vote, thanks to a balanced budget and, read his lips, "no new taxes."

Weld's boldness inspired New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman. Whitman was elected in 1993 by promising lower taxes, and she immediately pushed through a 30 percent tax reduction.

Michigan Gov. John Engler is another ax-wielder who cruised to re-election, and he proves the first law of politics: "The more tax money that flows into government coffers the more money government will spend." Whitman states the corollary: "As soon as you start limiting revenues, government will do more with less."

Rather than crippling state governments, less money could make them healthier. Tax cuts create the discipline needed to streamline operations. States will have to learn to live within their means. Here's how they can do it:

Cut the help. It's time to let the chauffeur go. Experience shows that employment can be cut significantly without reducing essential services.

In his first 21 months, Weld cut the number of state employees under his control by almost 7,000, a 14 percent decrease. To stave off privatization, Massachusetts employees in the money-counting operation of the subway system voluntarily cut the number of workers to 59 from 71. In four years, Engler has cut the Michigan state payroll by 8 percent.

Gov. Terry Branstead of Iowa laid off 1,200 workers to balance his state's budget during the recession.

Significant downsizing can't occur without taking on the unions, and fiscal necessity can often provide the political courage needed. A promise to control spending sends the message that a governor puts taxpayers first. "Do I feel that I have an obligation to see to it that people who have been working in state government continue to work in state government? No, I don't," Weld told Forbes last year.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Ax Wielders Improve State Governments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?