Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights

By Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), December 6, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights

Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)

Its call for term limits is getting the spotlight, but the "Contract with America's" fine print on curbing regulatory powers may pack an even bigger wallop for government.

Buried in the House Republicans' 10-bill package are provisions that could make it vastly harder for federal agencies to issue regulations, especially new environmental rules in cases where the need may not be urgent.

One of the proposals - forcing the government to pay compensation if a regulation harms property values - is shaping up as a key environmental battle in the new Congress. Environmental advocates contend that the contract amounts to a dangerous attack on pollution control.

"What they propose would undermine the government's ability to carry out federal laws in a significant way," said Gary D. Bass, an analyst with OMB Watch, an environmental group in Washington that focuses on federal spending and on the Office of Management and Budget.

The regulatory changes are buried in the contract's bill No. 8, the Job Creation and Wage Enhancement Act. The bill is best known for proposing a cut in the capital-gains tax. Other provisions would:

Set up a private-property compensation program that would require government to reimburse landowners when protection of wetlands, endangered species, shoreline or any regulation reduced the value of property by more than 10 percent.

Place curbs on "unfunded mandates" by barring new rules unless federal agencies provided money to state and local governments to enforce them.

Require the government to conduct two kinds of studies before issuing any regulation that would affect more than 100 people. One study would look at risks of pollution. Another would weigh the costs and benefits of regulations. Both types of studies would have to be reviewed by panels of experts outside government.

The contract also calls for a ceiling on how much the government can spend on regulations that carry out federal laws. Under one provision, the government's spending for regulations could not exceed 5 percent of the gross domestic product - the country's economic output. Republican sponsors also may seek an immediate cut of 6.5 percent in the government's regulatory budget.

Most of the provisions were drawn up before Republicans scored their startling successes in the elections, giving them control of the House for the first time since President Dwight D. Eisenhower was in the White House.

`A Lot Of Thought'

Brian Gunderson, a top aide to Rep. Richard Armey, R-Texas, the incoming House majority leader, said the Republicans remained committed to pushing the curbs on regulatory power with minimal changes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?