Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights

By Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), December 6, 1994 | Go to article overview

Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights


Bill Lambrecht Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Its call for term limits is getting the spotlight, but the "Contract with America's" fine print on curbing regulatory powers may pack an even bigger wallop for government.

Buried in the House Republicans' 10-bill package are provisions that could make it vastly harder for federal agencies to issue regulations, especially new environmental rules in cases where the need may not be urgent.

One of the proposals - forcing the government to pay compensation if a regulation harms property values - is shaping up as a key environmental battle in the new Congress. Environmental advocates contend that the contract amounts to a dangerous attack on pollution control.

"What they propose would undermine the government's ability to carry out federal laws in a significant way," said Gary D. Bass, an analyst with OMB Watch, an environmental group in Washington that focuses on federal spending and on the Office of Management and Budget.

The regulatory changes are buried in the contract's bill No. 8, the Job Creation and Wage Enhancement Act. The bill is best known for proposing a cut in the capital-gains tax. Other provisions would:

Set up a private-property compensation program that would require government to reimburse landowners when protection of wetlands, endangered species, shoreline or any regulation reduced the value of property by more than 10 percent.

Place curbs on "unfunded mandates" by barring new rules unless federal agencies provided money to state and local governments to enforce them.

Require the government to conduct two kinds of studies before issuing any regulation that would affect more than 100 people. One study would look at risks of pollution. Another would weigh the costs and benefits of regulations. Both types of studies would have to be reviewed by panels of experts outside government.

The contract also calls for a ceiling on how much the government can spend on regulations that carry out federal laws. Under one provision, the government's spending for regulations could not exceed 5 percent of the gross domestic product - the country's economic output. Republican sponsors also may seek an immediate cut of 6.5 percent in the government's regulatory budget.

Most of the provisions were drawn up before Republicans scored their startling successes in the elections, giving them control of the House for the first time since President Dwight D. Eisenhower was in the White House.

`A Lot Of Thought'

Brian Gunderson, a top aide to Rep. Richard Armey, R-Texas, the incoming House majority leader, said the Republicans remained committed to pushing the curbs on regulatory power with minimal changes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Next Hot Issue on Hill: EPA vs. Property Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.