Interest Groups Get Free Ride on Campus

By David Rothbard and Craig Rucker | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), August 28, 1995 | Go to article overview

Interest Groups Get Free Ride on Campus


David Rothbard and Craig Rucker, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Does the First Amendment extend to our nation's campuses? If a recent vote in the U.S. House of Representatives is any indication, the answer is a clear and resounding "No!"

The House voted 263 to 161 against an amendment offered by Rep. Gerald Solomon, R-N.Y., that would have made it illegal for colleges and universities to force students to subsidize political groups with which they disagree. The amendment would have stopped a wide array of special-interest groups - ranging from consumer and environmental organizations to those that advocate gay and lesbian rights - from using mandatory or deceptive student fees to fill their coffers. It would have forced them to rely on purely voluntary contributions to further their agendas.

Speaking for the Democratic minority - a minority that somehow reeled in more than 70 Republicans to help them defeat the proposal - Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., said, "This is indeed a dangerous amendment."

His reason: Because this measure, like others the Republicans have crafted to defund such liberal icons as the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts, would presumably stifle the free expression of those on the left.

Sadly, though, nothing could be further from the truth. This bill, far from squelching free speech, is perhaps the best way to reinstate it in the politically correct vistas of our nation's ivory towers.

For too many years, special-interest groups have been able to take a free ride on the backs of students who often do not even know, much less support, the organizations to which they are forced to contribute. These groups do this either by sneaking their charges into the mandatory student fees assessed at registration time or simply by slipping them into a "negative check-off" box on the college tuition bill. In this scheme, students are assessed a fee unless they are astute enough to check a box indicating otherwise. Failure to check the box, of course, means automatic payment.

The most conspicuous of these shamsters is Ralph Nader's Public Interest Research Group, or PIRG, which garners millions of dollars each year largely through the use of negative check-offs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Interest Groups Get Free Ride on Campus
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.