Equal Protection Includes Gays

By Clarence Page Copyright Chicago Tribune | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), October 13, 1995 | Go to article overview

Equal Protection Includes Gays


Clarence Page Copyright Chicago Tribune, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


It is not just the rights of gays and lesbians at stake in Colorado's anti-homosexual initiative, which was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court this week. The rest of us have a big interest, too.

At issue before the court is Colorado's Amendment 2, a November 1992 referendum in which voters voted narrowly to overrule all local laws that barred discrimination against homosexuals.

Kevin Tebedo, executive director of the measure's sponsoring group, Colorado for Family Values, forged an instant coalition with moderates by wording the measure in a way that enabled supporters to be anti-gay without sounding anti-gay, the best of both terrible worlds.

As Tebedo said to me and others in interviews at the time, "We support equal rights, we only oppose granting anyone special rights."

That doesn't sound so bad, until he then declares any and all equal rights protections to be "special rights" when they are delineated for homosexuals.

Had his amendment gone into effect, Tebedo conceded, homosexuals could be refused not only housing, schooling or employment but also emergency-room care at hospitals.

Richard Evans, 35, of Denver, sued and the Colorado Supreme Court struck down the amendment "because it bars gay men, lesbians and bisexuals from having an effective voice in governmental affairs," particularly in seeking legislation that would protect them from discrimination.

Now before the U.S. Supreme Court, Evans' suit faces a tough audience. In its last homosexual rights case, Bowers vs. Hardwick, in 1986, the court ruled that police acted correctly when they busted in on two homosexuals while they were engaged in a private sex act and arrested them for it.

Three of those justices remain on the bench. Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor voted that the Constitution did not protect private homosexual conduct. Justice John Paul Stevens dissented.

In its own way, that ruling was about as breathtaking as Chief Justice Roger B. Taney's historic declaration in 1857 that the black man had "no rights the white man was bound to respect" in the case of the slave Dred Scott, a decision that helped rush the nation into the Civil War. The Rehnquist court decided, in effect, that consenting homosexual adults had no privacy rights that the police were bound to respect.

Colorado's Amendment 2 goes further. It bans not only homosexual conduct but also civil rights protections under the cover of "protecting" the right of the rest of us from any "special" rights awarded to homosexuals. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Equal Protection Includes Gays
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.