An Amendment May Be the Only Cure for Addiction to Budget Deficits

By Stephen Chapman Copyright Creators Syndicate, Inc. | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), November 2, 1996 | Go to article overview

An Amendment May Be the Only Cure for Addiction to Budget Deficits


Stephen Chapman Copyright Creators Syndicate, Inc., St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


It becomes increasingly clear that the most interesting debate of the presidential campaign would have pitted Bill Clinton against Bill Clinton. Affirming once again that he will never settle for one position on an issue when he can have two, or three, the president at first said he might be able to go along with a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution if it provided some flexibility during recessions. This seemed to be at least a partial reversal of his past rejection of such an amendment in any form, which itself was a reversal of his onetime endorsement of the idea.

By the next day, the administration was insisting it was still unalterably opposed, no matter what the president thinks. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin warned that the measure would "create an inflexibility that can turn a downturn into a recession and a recession into a worse recession."

His fear is that the government would not be able to run a deficit even when it urgently needed to. Talk of devising an escape hatch was futile, he said. "I don't see how you can draft an escape hatch that will protect you against all contingencies." There is something charming about Rubin's fantasy that a relentlessly frugal Congress will refuse to let the budget go into deficit no matter what, stubbornly raising taxes and slashing spending even when the economy is in ruins. This is like worrying that Bruce Willis will henceforth refuse to make any movie not based on an Anthony Trollope novel. The reality is that in recent decades, our elected leaders have been pathetically eager to spend well beyond our means even during boom times. In the last 40 years, the federal budget has been balanced exactly three times. The last balanced budget was in 1969. During the expansion of 1982-89 and the current expansion, which began in 1991, the deficit has never dropped below $100 billion. Yet the secretary of the treasury has circles under his eyes from lying awake at night fretting that we'll develop an incorrigible habit of budgetary responsibility. In fact, we're addicted to getting more government than we pay for, year after year. Since 1981, we've added nearly $3 trillion to the federal debt - and, in the best-case scenario, it will take five years to bring spending and revenue into balance. We like government programs, but we hate paying for them. The habit feeds on itself: The more deficits we run, the more we have to pay in interest on the debt, and the harder it gets to eliminate the deficit. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Amendment May Be the Only Cure for Addiction to Budget Deficits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.