Welfare Makeover Was Led by States Federal Legislation Reflected Experiments and Changes under Way across Country

By Terence Samuel Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), June 8, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Welfare Makeover Was Led by States Federal Legislation Reflected Experiments and Changes under Way across Country


Terence Samuel Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


THE FEDERAL WELFARE reform bill that President Bill Clinton signed into law last summer has been described as a wholesale reordering of national priorities.

Some call it a bold political stroke; others consider it a complete capitulation. Most agree it secured the right to genuine experimentation by states.

But as contentious as it was, the federal legislation had the qualities of what economists call a trailing indicator: It was more a reflection of what had been happening than what was going to happen. States have been experimenting with welfare reform since 1989, when Ohio got a waiver that allowed it to deny benefits to teen mothers who did not go to school. Oregon applied for waivers at the same time to require recipients to work for their benefits. By the time Clinton signed the landmark legislation in August, 44 states - including Missouri and Illinois - had waivers from federal officials to operate their welfare systems in some altered form, often requiring recipients to work or be in school to receive benefits. Much of the reform took place by governors' executive orders or through budgeting decisions. Michigan, for example, began to encourage families to stay together by raising the eligibility income level for married couples. Oregon required welfare recipients to attend job-training classes, and then paid their benefits as a wage check. True Experimentation After welfare reform became a winning political issue in 1992, when candidate Clinton promised the "end welfare as we know it," many state legislatures passed their own versions of welfare reform. Missouri is one of only three states that have yet to implement a legislatively sanctioned welfare reform package, which allows states to deal more creatively with reforming welfare. Across the country, the law has led to true varied experimentation. For example, Michigan is raising the amount of assets a family can have while on welfare from $1,000 to $3,000, before they are no longer eligible for welfare benefits. "We think that it is better to let people build up a little nest egg so that when they are no longer in the system and run into a little trouble, they don't come right back to us," said Margarete Gravina of the Michigan Family Independence Agency. Michigan has also changed its work requirements for women with babies. "You were exempt from those rules if you had a child under 12 months.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Welfare Makeover Was Led by States Federal Legislation Reflected Experiments and Changes under Way across Country
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?