Political Fund Raising by Women's Groups Is Growing Sharply

By 1997, Boston Globe | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), June 8, 1997 | Go to article overview

Political Fund Raising by Women's Groups Is Growing Sharply


1997, Boston Globe, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Money, it is said, is the mother's milk of politics. Now, it is clear that large amounts of political money are coming from mothers.

The top political action committee was Emily's List, a group dedicated to electing women Democrats who favor abortion rights. Emily is an acronym for "early money is like yeast" (which helps raise dough).

The PAC not only raised $13.6 million, but its members separately were the largest group of contributors to federal candidates. Just a decade ago, groups such as Emily's List were only a gleam in the eyes of a few people who today call themselves the "founding mothers" of the women's political finance effort. Emily's List, which was founded in 1986, has grown from about 3,500 donors in 1990 to more than 60,000 today. As Emily's List has prospered, similar groups have come onto the scene and grown quickly. Impressed by such success, Hillary Rodham Clinton encouraged the Democratic Party to create the Women's Leadership Forum to raise money. She was the headline attraction at 27 events sponsored by the forum, bringing in $11 million. That is nearly twice the amount of money raised from Asian-Americans by former Democratic Party official John Huang, whose actions have drawn so much scrutiny. "There has been a psychological shift where women realize they can take control of their resources," said Ellen Malcolm, president and founder of Emily's List. "It used to be that women said, `I have to ask my husband.' " Despite this success, recent headlines about women donors have focused on a decision by the Hollywood Women's Political Committee to shut its doors. The committee, which has worked closely with major donors such as actresses Barbra Streisand and Jane Fonda, announced recently that it will go out of business on June 30 because its members are fed up with the current campaign finance system. "We will no longer collaborate with a system that promotes the buying and selling of political office," the Hollywood group declared. But despite the Hollywood group's star power - Streisand, for example, has headlined million-dollar galas for President Clinton - the group itself raised only $1.4 million in the last campaign, far less than the top women's groups. The Hollywood committee has contributed about $6 mill ion since its inception in 1984, just half the amount that Emily's List collected in the last campaign alone. To be sure, politics remains largely a man's world. Only nine of 100 US senators are women, as are about 12 percent of U.S. House members. And that is after a marked increase in recent years. But all those soccer Mom stories had a point: More women voted than men in the presidential election. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Political Fund Raising by Women's Groups Is Growing Sharply
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.