NATO Expansion `No Easy Sell,' Lawmaker Says Senate Must Approve Plan, despite Concerns about Moving East toward Russia

By Harry Levins Of The Post-Dispatch | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), May 18, 1997 | Go to article overview

NATO Expansion `No Easy Sell,' Lawmaker Says Senate Must Approve Plan, despite Concerns about Moving East toward Russia


Harry Levins Of The Post-Dispatch, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


BEFORE NATO can take a single step to the east, the U.S. Senate will have to render a salute.

The reason: NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization - and the key word is "treaty." The Constitution lets the president enter into treaties, "provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur."

So far, the expansion of NATO into Central Europe has just been talk, generating little debate in Congress. But now that the Russians have agreed, if only grudgingly, the issue goes to the Senate, which can dig in as tenaciously as Russian infantry. "This is no easy sell," says Sen. Richard G. Lugar, R-Ind. Indeed, one complaint has been the lack of deliberation on the issue. That complaint should fade as the Senate takes up the matter. Here, in summary form, are some of the arguing points. The Negatives * A Russian backlash. Critics say that pushing NATO eastward will only push the Russians' backs farther into the wall. Many Russians still see NATO as the enemy. (As preposterous as it may seem to us, many Cold War Russians thought NATO - prodded by a revanchist Germany - had aggressive eyes on Mother Russia.) In the '90s, the Russians have suffered the loss of great-power status - a blow to the national pysche. To the east, they face a China on the upswing. To their south, they face Islamic unrest. And now, to the west, N ATO wants to edge closer, nuclear weapons and all. The critics say NATO will reinforce Russian hard-liners and frustrate Russian reformers. What's more, they say, the Russians will back out of arms-control talks in a huff and maybe even retreat into Cold War militarism. * Removal of Europe's buffer zone. NATO's writ now stops at the German border. That leaves a buffer zone in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic - the very countries expected to sign up for NATO. The Russians grow vexed at the thought of losing this space between themselves and Germany, which twice in this century has marched its gray legions into Russia. After the Cold War, the Russians pulled their soldiers out of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. They think it's hardly cricket now for NATO to move its soldiers in. * Misplacement of forces. Few people expect the Russians to march on the Poles, Czechs and Hungarians. The people who really need protection live next door to Russia, in Ukraine and the Baltic states. These critics ask: Why isn't NATO going where it's needed? (The answer: Because the Russians would go berserk. Although today's wretched Russia resembles a Third World country, it's a Third World country with nuclear missiles.) * The expense of expansion. The Czechs, Poles and Hungarians built their armies around Soviet weapons and tactics. So did the Iraqis, and look where it got them. The new NATO members would have to scrap the Soviet gear and modernize with Western arms. The cost: somewhere near $30 billion. In an age when NATO countries are shrinking arms budgets, that's a lot. The United States thinks it can kick in only $2 billion, with Europe picking up the rest. The Europeans are understandably cool. * A dilution of unity and purpose. Critics say NATO succeeded because it was a tightly knit group of common-minded democracies. But in Central Europe, democracy is a dream, not a tradition. The critics worry that NATO could water itself down into just another international organization that talks a lot. * A loss of credibility. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty makes NATO one for all, all for one. Members must treat an attack on one as an attack on all. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

NATO Expansion `No Easy Sell,' Lawmaker Says Senate Must Approve Plan, despite Concerns about Moving East toward Russia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.