Libor Warning Signs Were There, but No One Acted
Das, Satyajit, The Independent (London, England)
In June, the UK and US authorities fined Barclays Bank 290m for manipulating money market benchmark rates, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor).
Before 2007, traders at Barclays manipulated rates in order to obtain a financial benefit. Subsequently, during the global financial crisis, Barclays manipulated rates due to reputational concerns.
Lord Turner, the head of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), told a parliamentary committee that it hadn't occurred to him before 2009 that Libor could be manipulated. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that Libor submissions may have been manipulated over a long period. Banks and regulators may have been aware of these practices for some time but did not take corrective action.
Barclays' senior management and board of directors have indicated that they became aware of the problem only recently. The banks still offer the same excuse as JP Morgan Jnr in 1933: "Since we have not more power of knowing the future than any other men, we have made many mistakes (who has not during the past five years?), but our mistakes have been errors of judgement and not of principle."
The practice appears blatant, and warnings were ignored. Canadian court documents indicate that a UBS employee contacted employees at other banks with a view to achieving a "certain movement" in yen Libor. The correspondence does not attempt to hide the actions from superiors or express concern about any breach of internal or regulatory rules.
In a Singapore lawsuit against RBS for wrongful dismissal, Tan Chi Min alleged that he and his fellow traders were regularly consulted by senior managers and personnel responsible for setting the bank's yen Libor submission. The filing alleges that there was no regulation, policy or guidelines for submissions. RBS's position is that Mr Tan was dismissed for trying to manipulate the bank's rate setting to benefit his trading positions between 2007 and 2011.
In 2007 and 2008, it appears that Barclays' compliance department did not act on three separate internal warnings about conflicts of interest and "patently false" rate submissions. In an opinion piece in The Independent on 7 July this year, a former Barclays employee alleged that problems with Libor fixings were escalated by several people up to their directors and …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Libor Warning Signs Were There, but No One Acted. Contributors: Das, Satyajit - Author. Newspaper title: The Independent (London, England). Publication date: July 24, 2012. Page number: 54. © 2009 The Independent - London. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.