Polygraph Tests: A `Dumb Mistake'

By Michael Zimmerman and J. D. Zimmerman. Michael Zimmerman is a biology teacher, and J. D. Zimmerman a. biology major, . | The Christian Science Monitor, April 1, 1989 | Go to article overview

Polygraph Tests: A `Dumb Mistake'


Michael Zimmerman and J. D. Zimmerman. Michael Zimmerman is a biology teacher, and J. D. Zimmerman a. biology major, ., The Christian Science Monitor


LAST year nearly 2 million Americans looking for work were forced to submit to polygraph, or lie detector, tests. The most conservative estimates suggest that approximately 300,000 law- abiding citizens failed their tests, were assumed to be poor employment risks, and thus lost any chance of being hired. According to some estimates, it is possible that three times that number of innocent job applicants did not pass polygraph examinations.

In response to statistics of this sort, and to what some have termed the "explosive growth" of polygraph testing in the last decade, Congress recently passed the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988. This legislation, which went into effect Dec. 27, has already had a huge impact on private employers.

Oddly enough, while the act almost completely bans polygraph testing in the private sector, it exempts federal, state, and local governments from its provisions, and allows the federal government to continue testing private individuals engaged in activities perceived to be related to national security.

The majority of lawmakers voting for the law recognized the art of lie detection for what it is: pseudo-science dressed in a high- tech fa,cade. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts, one of the bill's major supporters, referred to lie detectors as "inaccurate instruments of intimidation" and called polygraph testing "little more than a 20th-century version of witchcraft." Rep. Matthew Martinez (D) of California characterized the polygraph machine as a "black voodoo box," while then-Rep. James Jeffords (R) of Vermont denounced lie detection as being no more accurate "than flipping a coin."

Yet Congress sanctioned an embarrassing piece of legislative hypocrisy. Why retain the privilege of hooking present or prospective public employees up to machines that are no more useful than astrological charts, handwriting analysis, or palmistry?

Many of those opposing the law shared deep skepticism about polygraph testing, but few moved to delete the governmental immunity, opting instead either to weaken or defeat the law's existing provisions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Polygraph Tests: A `Dumb Mistake'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.