Slip in US Productivity Raises Questions on Government's Role Even as the United States Is Engaged in a Struggle to Keep Up with Its Global Business Competitors, There Is a Battle within US Borders over the Proper Role of Government in Keeping American Workers Productive Series: NATIONAL ISSUES FORUM. Part 2 of a 3-Part Series. First of Two Articles Appearing Today

By David R. Francis, writer of The Christian Science Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, November 14, 1990 | Go to article overview

Slip in US Productivity Raises Questions on Government's Role Even as the United States Is Engaged in a Struggle to Keep Up with Its Global Business Competitors, There Is a Battle within US Borders over the Proper Role of Government in Keeping American Workers Productive Series: NATIONAL ISSUES FORUM. Part 2 of a 3-Part Series. First of Two Articles Appearing Today


David R. Francis, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


WORDS, words, words. For a decade, politicians, corporate executives, and academics have expressed varying degrees of alarm about the international competitiveness of United States industry.

The litany is familiar. Productivity gains are too small. Savings are inadequate. US business investment lags behind that of Japan. There's not enough civilian research and development. Too many youths are functionally illiterate and perform poorly in mathematics and science. As a result, the American dream of ever-increasing prosperity for succeeding generations has turned into a delusion of grandeur.

"Things are getting worse daily," says Fred Branfman, director of Rebuild America, a Washington think tank, and one of the most pessimistic commentators on America's competitive prospects. "It's midnight for America."

But have companies, governmental programs, and individuals moved beyond the countless lectures, books, and studies to actual action?

Yes, says Richard Lester, executive director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Commission on Industrial Productivity. "It is possible to see things at the firm level which you would not have seen three or four years ago - and certainly not at the beginning of the 1980s when this debate on competitiveness began. Things that have happened, particularly in manufacturing, are in the right direction."

Mr. Lester cautioned, however: "At the level of government, it is hard to be as positive."

That view is shared by some other academic experts.

William Pierskalla, director of the Huntsmen Center for Global Competition and Leadership at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, says, "Some firms are becoming very good competitors. Others are a little slower."

He sees progress in quality control at all levels of some major companies, from helping suppliers provide quality parts and services, to improved the manufacturing processes, to better design for manufacturing and service.

But in regard to the advancement of education, necessary to provide the United States with a competent labor force, Professor Pierskalla comments: "There is a lot of rhetoric, but I don't think much is being done."

David Teece, a professor of international business and finance at the University of California at Berkley's business school, finds a greater awareness in Washington of the competitive challenge. "But it hasn't translated into change at the policy level."

In fact, Congress did appropriate more money to make US industry competitive than the Bush administration requested in the massive budget package passed last month. Congress provided $36 million for the Advanced Technology Program of the Commerce Department. President Bush had asked for $10 million for the program, aimed at assisting research consortia find commercial applications for advanced technologies.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense got $100 million for new programs, a substantial increase. The money is to be used for research with both military and commercial potential, with half going to develop manufacturing technology and the other half for five consortia doing "pre-competitive" research. By administration definition that is research "which occurs prior to the development of application-specific commercial prototypes." Such research results "can be shared among potential competitors without reducing the financial incentives for individual firms to develop and market commercial products and processes based upon the results."

Congress also appropriated research money for robotics, high-performance computing, semiconductors, superconductivity, and advanced imaging technologies (including doubling the money for high-definition TV). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Slip in US Productivity Raises Questions on Government's Role Even as the United States Is Engaged in a Struggle to Keep Up with Its Global Business Competitors, There Is a Battle within US Borders over the Proper Role of Government in Keeping American Workers Productive Series: NATIONAL ISSUES FORUM. Part 2 of a 3-Part Series. First of Two Articles Appearing Today
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.