Court Broadens Sources' Defense against Press Breaking Anonymity Pledge Can Be Breach of Contract; Fabricating Quotes Grounds for Libel

By Marshall Ingwerson, writer of The Christian Science Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, June 26, 1991 | Go to article overview

Court Broadens Sources' Defense against Press Breaking Anonymity Pledge Can Be Breach of Contract; Fabricating Quotes Grounds for Libel


Marshall Ingwerson, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


IN a matter of days, the United States Supreme Court has issued two separate rulings that open up the press to lawsuits from news sources.

The upshot is that newspapers and magazines could conceivably report fewer nuggets of sensitive or controversial news, but the news that readers lose will also be some of the least reliable.

The Supreme Court ruled June 24 that a news source who gave information to two Minnesota newspapers on the condition of anonymity could sue them for breaking that promise.

The ruling came on the heels of a decision June 20 that interview subjects could hold a journalist liable for fabricating remarks presented inside quotation marks.

Many journalists admit to mixed feelings over the decisions.

They don't like to be told how to treat their sources by the courts, and many who found no cause for concern in the first decision last week see a foreboding intrusiveness in both of them together.

Yet the minimum standards of journalistic ethics set by the court, some journalists concede, may benefit press credibility.

"Both cases strike me as having the same common thread," says Scott Armstrong, an investigative reporter formerly with the Washington Post and now teaching at American University. In both cases, he says, the court applies minimum standards of reporting.

The practice of quoting people while keeping their identities confidential is a widespread daily routine among reporters. For newspapers to break these agreements is relatively rare. Reporters, in fact, are occasionally jailed for refusing to divulge sources.

In the Minnesota case, a public relations man working for one political candidate in 1982 gave newspaper reporters potentially damaging information about another. Editors then decided to publish his name as the source. He was fired by his advertising agency.

He sued for breach of an implied contract to keep his name confidential, and he won. The Minnesota Supreme Court overturned the victory. The US Supreme Court now returns the case to the state court with the judgment that breach of contract is a legitimate grounds for the suit.

The court's new decision adds the threat of expensive lawsuits and monetary damages to the ethical commitment to protect sources. The result could mean that editors will press reporters to cut down on using anonymous sources, says Bill Kovach, curator of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Court Broadens Sources' Defense against Press Breaking Anonymity Pledge Can Be Breach of Contract; Fabricating Quotes Grounds for Libel
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.