US, Japan Face Deep Strains in Relations the 50th Anniversary of the Bombing of Pearl Harbor Comes at a Time of Growing Suspicion over Economic Ties between Japan and the US. Today, the Monitor Assesses the Significance of the Anniversary for Both Nations

By George D. Moffett Iii, writer of The Christian Science Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, December 6, 1991 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

US, Japan Face Deep Strains in Relations the 50th Anniversary of the Bombing of Pearl Harbor Comes at a Time of Growing Suspicion over Economic Ties between Japan and the US. Today, the Monitor Assesses the Significance of the Anniversary for Both Nations


George D. Moffett Iii, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


FIFTY years after Pearl Harbor, relations between the United States and Japan have reached another critical turning point.

Since the end of World War II, the Pacific giants have been close allies bound by a common enemy and a vast network of trade ties. But with the end of the cold war, strains have developed that have put the relationship to a test.

Adapting to new times need not be disruptive. As one State Department official notes, the US and Japan "share fundamental interests and values on most issues," and have far more to lose than gain if relations are allowed to deteriorate.

But adapting the relationship will require major adjustments, both psychological and structural. If the transition is not managed skillfully and if growing antagonism over trade issues is not contained, relations could take a huge retrograde step.

In the worst case, trade tensions could lead to a "yen-dominated free-trade bloc in Asia which would have a wall up around it toward the outside," says Edson Spencer, chairman of the Commission on US-Japanese Relations for the Twenty-First Century. "That would be a different kind of Pearl Harbor leading to a series of events that could lead to a breakdown of US-Japan relations."

"It remains to be seen whether the US-Japan 'problem' is a prologue to estrangement or marks a shaking out period for a transformed alliance which enjoys the confidence of our respective publics," concludes a commission report issued last month.

At both ends of the alliance, the collapse of the Soviet threat has prompted a rethinking of foreign policy priorities that could impinge on US-Japanese ties.

In Washington, policymakers advocate more selective engagement abroad and closer attention to problems at home. One manifestation is the gradual drawdown of forward-based military positions in the Pacific, including the Philippines and South Korea.

In Tokyo, meanwhile, policymakers debate how to play a more assertive role abroad without engendering political divisions in a country already distracted by financial scandals and discontent with soaring prices.

"The question for Japan is, how can Japan play a more responsible role in the world ... and still continue to be Japan," says Stephen Bosworth, president of the US-Japan Foundation.

"Decisions are now being made in the US and Japan that will shape the relationship for the next decade, if not the next 50 years," comments Philip Brenner, a professor of international relations at American University.

President Bush has rescheduled a trip to Japan and three other Asian nations which was canceled earlier last month because of pressure to devote more attention to domestic affairs.

Though official reaction to the cancellation was muted in Japan, Japanese leaders were clearly disappointed that the symbolic reaffirmation of close US-Japan ties will not take place before the Dec. 7 anniversary of Pearl Harbor. Mr. Bush will arrive in Japan for a three-day visit on Jan. 7. On Dec. 7 he will participate in ceremonies at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

On the eve of the anniversary, 84 percent of Americans hold a friendly view of Japan, according to a Roper poll conducted for the American Enterprise Institute. Seventy-five percent believe that Pearl Harbor is "all in the past" and should not have bearing on US-Japan relations.

But beneath the veneer of general support is widespread anger in the US, especially among American workers, over Japanese trade practices that have contributed to the US's $40 billion annual trade deficit with Japan. If the deficit is not reduced, the temptation for politicians to look for scapegoats could prove irresistible.

"Now that the Soviet Union is no longer out there as a threat, politicians are likely to look for new people to blame for things that aren't going right," says Mr. Edson, speaking at a Johns Hopkins University forum on US-Japanese relations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

US, Japan Face Deep Strains in Relations the 50th Anniversary of the Bombing of Pearl Harbor Comes at a Time of Growing Suspicion over Economic Ties between Japan and the US. Today, the Monitor Assesses the Significance of the Anniversary for Both Nations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.