With Deficit Looming, Britain Aims for Leaner Armed Forces

By Alexander MacLeod, Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, October 2, 1993 | Go to article overview

With Deficit Looming, Britain Aims for Leaner Armed Forces


Alexander MacLeod, Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


BRITAIN'S defenses are threatened with deep spending cuts as Prime Minister John Major strives to curb a ballooning public debt.

A British pounds3 billion ($4.5 billion) tactical nuclear missile system for the Royal Air Force is to be scrapped, and there have been strong indications from official sources that entire fighter-bomber squadrons and tank regiments will disappear in a bid to save money.

Leaks from the Treasury making it clear that the nation's current defense budget is too high - at British pounds24 billion ($36 billion) - have brought sharp criticism from members of the House of Commons defense committee.

Sir Nicholas Bonsor, the committee chairman, has warned Mr. Major that Britain's defense will be severely undermined if the Treasury gets its way in seeking cuts in troops and materiel.

"Any further Treasury-imposed cuts upon our defense capabilities would result in an unacceptable level of stress upon our hard-pressed defense forces," he wrote in an Oct. 16 letter to the prime minister. "I believe that, were that to happen, there would be a catastrophic loss of morale among our servicemen and damage, which would be almost irretrievable, would be done to our long-term defense capability."

The warning was supported by Lord Bramall, chief of the defense staff, who said on Oct. 15 that the threatened cuts would have a "staggering" effect on the armed services' ability to meet existing commitments.

Sir Nicholas wrote to Major as the Commons prepared to debate Britain's defense needs now that the communist threat in Europe has receded.

Pressure from the Treasury to reduce the British pounds50 billion overall budget deficit appears to be the driving force behind a range of cuts that Defense Secretary Malcolm Rifkind was recently said to be fighting against.

The opposition Labour Party, in the past happy to see defense spending held under tight control, has also attacked Major.

"The scale of cuts being pressed on the government by Treasury officials will leave our armed forces overstretched, and without the ability to provide the country with an effective defense," said David Clark, Labour's defense policy spokesman.

Coming to Major's defense was Col. Michael Dewar, deputy director of the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies. He said the Army could afford to lose two tank regiments and the Royal Air Force (RAF) could lose two squadrons of aircraft without "doing grave damage to our ability to defend ourselves."

Kenneth Clarke, the chancellor of the exchequer, has stressed repeatedly the effect of the deficit as a drag on the economy. The deficit, he says, can be curbed only by raising taxes or slashing public expenditure. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

With Deficit Looming, Britain Aims for Leaner Armed Forces
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.