Future of Aging Dams in US Comes under Federal Scrutiny

By Brad Knickerbocker, writer of The Christian Science Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, March 2, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Future of Aging Dams in US Comes under Federal Scrutiny


Brad Knickerbocker, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


WHEN Sen. Bob Packwood visited southern Oregon recently it wasn't health care or crime or the Republican lawmaker's alleged sexual misconduct that his constituents wanted to talk about. It was a pair of dams along the Rogue River.

Should the 73-year-old Savage Rapids Dam be replaced with pumps and pipes? Should the Elk Creek Dam, only partially built and a major impediment to dwindling stocks of salmon and steelhead, be demolished?

Mr. Packwood promised to do what he could in Washington, but he wasn't very hopeful about Uncle Sam's coming up with extra funds for either project.

There's a growing debate over the relicensing or decommissioning of hundreds of dams. Environmentalists say hydropower is not entirely "clean" - i.e., dams harm wildlife habitat. The power industry is defending its economic interests. Some towns worry about losing sources of electricity, irrigation, flood control, and recreation that attract tourists.

Now the controversy centers around what to do about dams that may have outlived their usefulness, and who calls the shots.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), overseer of some 1,800 dams, has issued a "notice of inquiry" that has all interested parties scrambling.

The five commissioners, appointed by President Clinton, haven't said they will clamp down on dams of dubious worth. But they have posed for public response questions that make it clear they may do that. Questions are technical and legalistic, but they amount to this:Does the FERC have authority to order decommissioning of dams and, if so, can it require dam owners to pay for it?

Commission chairwoman Elizabeth Moler, a former staff member of the Senate Energy Committee who is seen as more activist than her predecessors, also has indicated that this somewhat arcane policy issue is to be opened to greater public scrutiny. She has ordered administrative reforms, including the preparation of more environmental-impact statements involving a "substantial increase" in public participation. "She's trying her darnedest to move the commission in the right direction," says Matthew Huntington of the conservation group American Rivers. Federal Power Act

The "notice of inquiry" on dam decommissioning has brought considerable response.

The Hydropower Reform Coalition of conservation groups cites legislative history and court precedent to assert that FERC has authority and responsibility to formulate a decommissioning policy under the 1920 Federal Power Act (FPA).

And the cost of decommissioning - which can range from tearing down dams to "replumbing" them to restore more natural water flows - shouldn't be borne by taxpayers, coalition spokesmen say.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Future of Aging Dams in US Comes under Federal Scrutiny
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?