House GOP Plan Aims to Bolster Family Ties Family Act Offers Tax Credits for Care of Elderly and for Adoption, and Tougher Child-Support Enforcement, but Cost Is High Series: REPUBLICNA ROAD MAP. Part of a Series

By Abraham McLaughlin, Monitor | The Christian Science Monitor, December 13, 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

House GOP Plan Aims to Bolster Family Ties Family Act Offers Tax Credits for Care of Elderly and for Adoption, and Tougher Child-Support Enforcement, but Cost Is High Series: REPUBLICNA ROAD MAP. Part of a Series


Abraham McLaughlin, Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor


DAN QUAYLE'S "family values" may soon see a new day.

One of the 10 proposals in the Republican "Contract With America" includes tax credits for care of elderly relatives and adoption, more efficient child-support collection mechanisms, and tougher punishments for sexual abuse.

Called the Family Reinforcement Act, the proposal was designed to be agreeable to both Republicans and Democrats.

"There was a concerted effort to eliminate abortion, school choice, and other controversial issues so as to attract as big a following as possible," says a Republican staffer on Capitol Hill.

House Republicans have promised to bring all 10 Contract proposals to a floor vote in the first 100 days of the 104th Congress.

Bipartisan support for the family act is strong, but the cost - $9 billion over five years, according to Republican estimates - remains a source of contention.

"The biggest challenge for supporters is finding the means to pay for it," says the staffer, requesting anonymity. "We have some ideas," but no specifics thus far.

Beyond cost, some Democrats charge that many of the ideas are simply rehashed versions of plans they introduced in the last two sessions of Congress.

But the most consistent criticism is that the proposal does not go far enough. How much substance?

Some elements are "largely symbolic," rhetorical tools for Republicans to advance the cause of "family values," charges Margaret Weir of the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank.

The $500 tax credit for families caring for elderly relatives, for example, is only "a nod toward the fact that there are some serious problems," says Judy Waxman, director of government affairs for the Washington-based lobbying group Families USA, referring to the financial burdens involved in caring for elderly family members.

Though she insists the money could be used more effectively, Ms. Waxman admits, "Who's going to turn {the $500} down?"

The tax credit would be refundable, so even families that owe no federal taxes would receive $500.

For the 58,000 families each year who pay an average of $10,000 in fees to adopt a child, the $5,000 adoption tax credit - also refundable - is "very much on the mark," says Mark Eckman, executive director of the Datz Foundation, a Washington-based adoption provider.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

House GOP Plan Aims to Bolster Family Ties Family Act Offers Tax Credits for Care of Elderly and for Adoption, and Tougher Child-Support Enforcement, but Cost Is High Series: REPUBLICNA ROAD MAP. Part of a Series
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?