Intelligence for the Future
DURING the cold war, most of the United States' intelligence effort was focused on the Soviet Union and its allies. The collapse of the Soviet state has led many to question whether America still needs a large intelligence establishment and if so, what it should do. This is not a matter of "covert action," much of which has been of dubious value in advancing US policy. Any new role should focus on collection and analysis of information from all sources: diplomatic and government reporting, the press, business analysis, spy satellites, and yes, spies. The US was in the intelligence game long before the cold war. The current structure, with a Central Intelligence Agency supplementing and drawing together the work of other government agencies, dates, essentially, from 1947. It was a direct result of the worst American intelligence disaster of the century: the failure to prevent the attack on Pearl Harbor when Navy, Army, and other intelligence existed that should have told policymakers exactly what Japanese strategists were up to. In a nuclear era, another Pearl Harbor-type mistake could be America's last. That's why the intelligence community is so necessary to national security, even in the absence of a Soviet Union. Nuclear weapons and materials are still out there - weapons that could be used by hostile states or terrorist groups to attack or blackmail the US and its allies. Drug smugglers and terrorists who are no friends of democracy often compete with national governments for power. Commercial rivals try to steal patents and technology. US military forces deployed around the world - near the Balkans, for example - need up-to-the-minute information about real or potential hostile moves. That's not to say the intelligence community doesn't need to improve and adapt; it does. …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Intelligence for the Future. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Christian Science Monitor. Publication date: October 4, 1995. Page number: 20. © 2009 The Christian Science Publishing Society. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.