Letters

By Louis Didier, Medea Benjamin, and Marie Shih | The Christian Science Monitor, April 28, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Letters


Louis Didier, Medea Benjamin, and Marie Shih, The Christian Science Monitor


Union Searches for Growth in Wrong Field

In "Strawberry Fields Become Fresh Union Battleground" (April 16) the balanced approach for which the Monitor is so renowned was sadly missing.

Contrary to the insinuation that growers do not provide fresh water and proper sanitation, California leads the nation in compliance with regulations which have been on the books since the early 1980s. The strawberry industry has the best record of compliance with these rules. As far as disgruntled workers or low pay are concerned, the vast majority of strawberry workers have rejected union representation not because of threats by the "boss" but because working conditions are good and the pay is superior. Workers average 20 percent or more above the established California minimum, which is higher than the federal minimum. The AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer's quote says it all: "We needed a national campaign that everybody could buy into. We picked strawberries." This is about money and power, not workers rights. The AFL-CIO needs bodies and dues, especially with president John J. Sweeney spending $6 million- plus during the last election. The article makes it look as if the workers are so beaten down and misinformed that they are being taken advantage of by the powerful growers! These workers, all US citizens or documented aliens, are informed, well paid, and very skilled at what they do. As for the growers, with all of the regulations on pesticides, labor laws, the INS and Border Patrol, and the specter of food safety hanging over them, do you really think they are going to mistreat their valued employees and pay them poor wages? Louis Didier Yuma, Ariz. Sweatshop wages will still fall short Your sanguine editorial "The Sweatshop Code" (April 18) fails to point out fatal flaws in the agreement on sweatshops signed by some industry and human rights groups. The agreement allows companies to continue to pay minimum wages that are often way below subsistence, instead of requiring that companies pay a living wage. While workers the world over have fought for decades to win a 40-hour week, this agreement allows companies to force workers to work 60 hours a week, and even more under "exceptional business circumstances.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Letters
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?