Top Court Narrows Affirmative Action in a 7-1 Ruling, the Justices Return a College Admissions Case to Lower Courts, Saying Schools Must Undergo 'Strict Scrutiny' to Justify Their Diversity Goals

By Chute, Eleanor | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA), June 25, 2013 | Go to article overview

Top Court Narrows Affirmative Action in a 7-1 Ruling, the Justices Return a College Admissions Case to Lower Courts, Saying Schools Must Undergo 'Strict Scrutiny' to Justify Their Diversity Goals


Chute, Eleanor, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA)


The U.S. Supreme Court has kept alive the use of affirmative action in college admissions, but it has made clear schools must undergo "strict scrutiny" to prove that they need to consider race to meet diversity goals.

The high court ruled, 7-1, Monday in a case involving a white woman, Abigail Noel Fisher, who challenged the race-conscious admissions policies at the University of Texas at Austin after she was rejected in 2008.

The justices sent the case back to the lower courts, saying the lower courts had not applied "the correct standard of strict scrutiny."

Ken Gormley, dean of the Duquesne University Law School, gave this analogy: The high court has "simply reaffirmed the rules of the football game and blown the whistle on this play because they think the lower courts didn't handle it properly. ...

"In fact, it is a rather striking pronouncement by the court that we are not going to disturb the prior precedents in the area."

Precedents, also involving white potential students, include the 1978 case involving Allan Bakke and the University of California at Davis and the 2003 case involving Barbara Grutter and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

Grutter permits the use of race as one of many "plus factors" in evaluating an individual applicant.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion for the majority. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas each wrote a concurring opinion.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, saying she believes the appeals court already had completed its inquiry and that its ruling in support of the university should have been affirmed.

Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the decision.

The court noted that each applicant must be evaluated as an individual and that race or ethnicity cannot be the defining feature of the application nor can a certain percentage be set.

The majority opinion stated that attaining a diverse student body "serves values beyond race alone, including enhanced classroom dialogue and the lessening of racial isolation and stereotypes."

It noted the university must prove in court "that the means chosen by the university to attain diversity are narrowly tailored to that goal."

The majority wrote that "strict scrutiny imposes on the university the ultimate burden of demonstrating, before turning to racial classifications, that available, workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice."

The high court stated that the appeals court said the petitioner could challenge only whether the decision to reintroduce race into admissions was made in good faith. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Top Court Narrows Affirmative Action in a 7-1 Ruling, the Justices Return a College Admissions Case to Lower Courts, Saying Schools Must Undergo 'Strict Scrutiny' to Justify Their Diversity Goals
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.