Separate, Please ; Secularism Is Not a Dirty Word

By Jones, Mike | Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK), February 26, 2012 | Go to article overview

Separate, Please ; Secularism Is Not a Dirty Word


Jones, Mike, Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK)


When a news story reports that a foreign country is a secular society, most Americans are pleased and comforted to know that some rogue nation is not being governed by wild-eyed radicals. When presidential candidates, politicians and some pastors warn Americans that their own country is headed toward secularism, many Americans run around as if their hair were on fire, predicting the end of the country as we know it.

Why is that? We are not headed toward secularism. We've already arrived. We've been an established secular society since the beginning of the republic. It's what the Founding Fathers thought so important that they included it in the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

No, the First Amendment doesn't say that specifically but it does guarantee freedom of religion. That includes, much to the chagrin of some, freedom from religion.

What it is

One definition of secularism is the belief that religion and ecclesiastical affairs should not enter into the functions of the state.

That brings up the separation of church and state that causes such an uproar. The Founders did not want the church dictating to the government and vice versa. It's a good rule that has served us well for 236 years. Despite what some politicians and others would have you believe, it is in no danger now.

Secularism is not a bad word. Nor is it a bad policy. In fact, most of the civilized world is secular: all of North America, most of Central and South America, most of sub-Saharan Africa, most of Europe and Asia, India, Australia and New Zealand.

The most theocratic countries lie in the Middle East and North Africa. That, of course, is where Islam dominates. And Islam scares the bejesus out of a lot of people. What those folks can't accept is that Islam doesn't make people bad; it's bad people that give Islam a bad name. Yes, interpreted in its strictest sense, it can become oppressive. Then again, so can Christianity. (See the Spanish Inquisition and the Crusades.)

Theocracy

No one - well, almost no one - wants the United States to become a theocracy. Iran is a theocracy. It has an elected president but is run by the mullahs. Iran used to be a secular society, but the regime installed by the United States - which was corrupt and brutal - was overthrown and replaced by the mullahs. Now the government of Iran is corrupt and brutal.

Saudi Arabia, one of the United States' best allies in the region and one of its biggest oil suppliers, is a theocracy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Separate, Please ; Secularism Is Not a Dirty Word
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.